AI Node Power Control via Chip Grouping and BMC Policy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power regulation methods for traditional servers are not applicable to AI computing nodes, as they fail to effectively manage the significant power consumption of computing chips, leading to inefficient power control.

Innovation Solution

A power regulation and control method involving a baseboard management controller (BMC) that acquires chip power values, groups computing chips, and adjusts power limit values based on a predefined policy to maintain energy efficiency within a target range, ensuring the AI computing node operates within optimal power parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional server power regulation methods are used (controlling internal memory, CPU, fan), then power control works for traditional servers, but it is ineffective for AI computing nodes where computing chips consume the majority of power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower regulation effectivenessVSAvoidapplicability to different computing node types
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from traditional components (CPU, memory, fan) to computing chip power consumption. It introduces new parameters including chip power values, power limit values, grouping levels, and energy efficiency values to effectively regulate power in AI computing nodes where chips dominate power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments computing chips into different groups based on their power consumption characteristics. By dividing chips into multiple groups with different power limit values, it enables differentiated power management that adapts to the specific power distribution patterns in AI computing nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If power limit values are reduced to lower power consumption, then power usage decreases, but energy efficiency of computing chips deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors actual power consumption and energy efficiency values, compares them against target ranges, and dynamically adjusts power limit values. This closed-loop control ensures power reduction while maintaining energy efficiency within acceptable boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic power management where power limit values are not fixed but adjusted in real-time based on actual power consumption patterns and energy efficiency measurements. The system can flexibly modify power limits across different chip groups to optimize the balance between power savings and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If uniform power limits are applied to all computing chips, then control is simple, but it cannot optimize energy efficiency for different chip power characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidenergy efficiency optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different power limit values to different groups of computing chips based on their local power consumption characteristics. Instead of a uniform approach, each chip group receives tailored power management parameters that match its specific operational profile, optimizing overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial power limiting strategies where not all chips are subjected to the same degree of power restriction. By selectively applying different power limit levels to different chip groups, it achieves effective power management without overly constraining any single group's performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11822412B2Power consumption regulation and control method, apparatus and device, and readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 INSPUR SUZHOU INTELLIGENT TECH CO LTD
  • US11822412B2 patent drawing
  • US11822412B2 patent drawing
  • US11822412B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power regulation and control method, apparatus and device, and a readable storage medium. The method disclosed in the present application includes: in response to a node power value of an artificial intelligence (AI) computing node being greater than a warning power value, acquiring, by a baseboard management controller (BMC), chip power values of computing chips in the AI computing node; obtaining a grouping result by grouping, according to the chip power values of the computing chips, the computing chips; and in response to the node power value being greater than a power capping value, querying a power regulation and control policy corresponding to the grouping result, and regulating power limit values of the computing chips according to the power regulation and control policy, such that a sum of all the power limit values is in a target range, where the warning power value is less than the power capping value, the power regulation and control policy is preset on the basis of the target range, and the target range is used for regulating and controlling energy efficiency values of the computing chips in the AI computing node.