AI Object Recognition Reliability via Collective Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for training artificial intelligence to recognize objects are inefficient and require repeated learning processes as the number of object types increases, necessitating a more reliable approach.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing collective intelligence-based mutual verification, where a server with an AI module trains by inputting structured data, extracts object region recognition data, and performs a collective verification procedure across user terminals to determine reliable learning data for improved AI reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional deep learning methods are used to train AI to recognize objects, then the AI can learn various forms of objects, but the process requires continuous repetition and significant time investment as the number of object types increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI object recognition reliabilityVSAvoidTraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces human users as intermediaries in the training process. Instead of relying solely on automated deep learning, the system presents images to users who manually annotate object regions. These user-generated annotations serve as high-quality training data, significantly reducing the time required to train AI models for new object types while improving recognition reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables crowd-sourced self-service annotation where users voluntarily participate in creating training data. Users download images, annotate object regions according to guidelines, and upload their work. This self-service approach eliminates the need for professional annotators and accelerates the data preparation process for AI training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If more learning data is collected to improve AI recognition accuracy, then the reliability improves, but the cost and time required for data collection and verification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveObject recognition accuracyVSAvoidData collection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple user annotations for the same image into a single consolidated training sample. By combining annotations from multiple users, the system creates more robust and accurate training data without requiring proportional increases in processing time. This merging approach efficiently leverages collective intelligence to improve recognition accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates multiple copies of the same training image and distributes them to different users for annotation. This allows parallel processing of data collection, where numerous images can be annotated simultaneously by different users, significantly increasing data collection productivity while maintaining high annotation quality through subsequent verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If professional personnel are used to annotate and verify training data, then the quality and reliability of training data improves, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAnnotation qualityVSAvoidTraining cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive professional annotators with ordinary users who provide annotations on a disposable, crowd-sourced basis. While individual user annotations may be less precise than professional work, the system compensates through aggregation and verification mechanisms. This approach dramatically reduces annotation costs while maintaining sufficient quality for AI training purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where user annotations are verified and validated through multiple layers of checking. Annotations from multiple users are compared, and discrepancies are resolved through additional verification. This feedback loop ensures that even though individual annotators are not professionals, the final consolidated annotations achieve high precision suitable for training reliable AI models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11798268B2Method for improving reliability of artificial intelligence-based object recognition using collective intelligence-based mutual verification
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 OGQ CORP
  • US11798268B2 patent drawing
  • US11798268B2 patent drawing
  • US11798268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for improving reliability of artificial intelligence-based object recognition, in which: in a server interworking with an artificial intelligence module, one or more object regions included in learning data including an image of a recognition target object to be recognized through the artificial intelligence module are recognized; object region recognition data which sets the recognized object regions is extracted and is provided to user terminals in a designated order; a procedure for receiving, from the user terminals, object region selection data which selects at least one effective object region corresponding to the recognition target object among object regions included in the object region recognition data is performed; and the object region selection data of respective users received from the user terminals is mutually compared and analyzed by the same object region selection data.