AI Offer Comparison Interface for Real-Time Property Negotiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional real estate transactions are inefficient, slow, and agent-centric, lacking technology that allows buyers and sellers to analyze and compare complex offers in real time, leading to delayed negotiations and lost opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A collaborative platform using AI models and unique graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for analyzing and displaying property offers, generating point values, and facilitating real-time negotiations, enabling buyers and sellers to compare offers efficiently and make informed decisions without agents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional agent-centric negotiation processes are used, then buyers and sellers can conduct transactions with human assistance, but the process becomes slow, disconnected, and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction efficiencyVSAvoidnegotiation duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables buyers and sellers to independently analyze, compare, and negotiate offers using automated AI models and interactive visual displays without requiring agent intervention for each negotiation step, allowing parties to self-manage the complex offer comparison process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual agent-based negotiation mechanics with an automated computer system that uses AI models to analyze offers, generate visual comparisons, and facilitate real-time negotiations between buyers and sellers through electronic interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If multiple offers are processed manually by agents, then comprehensive review of offer terms is possible, but the process becomes too inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoffer comparison accuracyVSAvoidoffer processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual offer analysis with AI models that automatically evaluate multiple offers against seller preferences, providing precise comparisons of complex offer terms including contingencies, financing, and closing dates through standardized scoring mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms multiple complex offer parameters into a single comparable point value through AI modeling, allowing sellers to quickly compare offers on an apples-to-apples basis while maintaining comprehensive evaluation of all offer conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If conventional GUIs are used to display offer information, then all offer details are presented, but the most relevant information is not efficiently communicated to buyers and sellers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidinformation accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of information presentation to different user needs, with the interactive visual display highlighting the most relevant offer comparisons (such as point values and key differentials) while maintaining access to complete offer details through standardized interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a visual dimension to offer comparison by displaying offers as graphical elements positioned according to their point values and differentials, allowing buyers and sellers to quickly grasp relative offer strengths without reading all textual details

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If traditional offer submission processes are used, then offers can be submitted through standard channels, but real-time negotiation and updates are not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidnegotiation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables continuous real-time negotiation where buyers and sellers can submit, update, and respond to offers immediately through the electronic platform, with the AI model continuously re-evaluating offers as new information becomes available, maintaining uninterrupted negotiation flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250348962A1Virtual marketspace smart negotiation
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 QONECTIN
  • US20250348962A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348962A1 patent drawing
  • US20250348962A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A graphical user interface including an interactive graphical component representing a seller's offer to sell a property and at least one offer to purchase a property. The interactive graphical component including, for the at least one offer to purchase the property, a first polygon extending from an axis to represent a net offer price and a second polygon extending from the axis to represent a point value. The point value being generated by a model using a plurality of offer inputs. The graphical user interface, responsive to receiving at least one updated offer associated with the at least one offer to purchase the property, includes an updated graphical component with a first revised polygon representing the updated point value in a position of the second polygon to represent the point value for the at least one updated offer.