Generative AI Orchestration Platform for Privacy and Interoperability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing generative AI platforms face issues such as lack of privacy protection, limited recent knowledge, incomplete knowledge domains, susceptibility to hallucination, incompatibility with proprietary information, interoperability challenges across different models, and inadequate legal, privacy, and ethical/bias checks, which hinder their effectiveness in corporate environments.

Innovation Solution

An interoperable generative AI orchestration platform that provides role-based access control, maximum discoverability of content, and democratization of development, enabling secure, accurate, and efficient use of generative AI systems by integrating role-based access control, a common knowledge base, and interoperability with various AI models, while ensuring privacy, accuracy, and compliance with ethical and legal standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing generative AI platforms are used to provide direct answers, then user productivity is improved, but privacy protection is compromised due to lack of access control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser productivityVSAvoidprivacy protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

An orchestration layer is introduced as an intermediary between users and multiple AI models. This layer manages authentication, authorization, and access control policies, allowing productive AI interactions while protecting privacy through role-based access control and policy enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments AI models into different categories (e.g., public, private, enterprise) with distinct access policies. Each model can have its own security requirements and access controls, enabling privacy protection for sensitive models while maintaining productivity through appropriate model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If existing generative AI platforms are used, then answer generation is enabled, but interoperability across different models is challenged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanswer generationVSAvoidinteroperability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The orchestration layer provides universal interfaces and standardized interaction protocols that work across multiple AI models from different providers. This enables easy answer generation while maintaining interoperability through a unified access mechanism that can adapt to various model types and providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of information

If existing generative AI platforms are deployed, then knowledge access is improved, but hallucination susceptibility increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge accessVSAvoidhallucination susceptibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where AI responses are evaluated against ground truth data, usage patterns, and user corrections. This feedback loop continuously improves response accuracy and reduces hallucinations while maintaining broad knowledge access through multiple models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple AI models are combined in the orchestration layer, allowing cross-validation of responses. When multiple models agree on an answer, confidence increases and hallucination risk decreases. Diverse model ensembles provide broader knowledge access while improving reliability through consensus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If existing generative AI platforms are used, then development speed is improved, but ethical and legal compliance is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment speedVSAvoidethical and legal compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Ethical and legal compliance checks are performed preliminarily through policy configuration and model selection before actual AI interactions. Access control policies, usage restrictions, and compliance rules are established in advance, enabling fast development while ensuring ethical and legal adherence from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240420012A1Systems and methods for interoperable generative artificial intelligence (AI) orchestration
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US20240420012A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420012A1 patent drawing
  • US20240420012A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject disclosure may include, for example, obtaining one or more information items or documents, checking the one or more information items or documents for determined sensitivity and determining role-based access for the one or more information items or documents, based on the checking and the determining, performing a preliminary analysis of the one or more information items or documents, wherein the preliminary analysis involves one or more pre-processing procedures, one or more chunking procedures, one or more embedding procedures, one or more customization procedures for particular use cases, or a combination thereof, and storing results of the preliminary analysis in a vector knowledge base for training one or more generative artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs). Other embodiments are disclosed.