Generative AI Output Caching for Similar Input Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine-learned systems face inefficiencies in computational resources and output quality due to the need for repeated inference cycles and non-deterministic output generation, especially when handling similar or slightly different inputs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a caching mechanism that stores generated outputs and retrieves them based on similarity metrics, guided by user interactions and context, to reduce computational costs and ensure high-quality outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a generative machine-learned model processes every input independently, then output quality and freshness are maintained, but computational resources are wasted and response time increases for similar inputs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidoutput quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-generates multiple candidate outputs for similar inputs and caches them in advance. When a new input arrives, the system retrieves pre-generated outputs that match the input, avoiding the need for real-time generation and significantly reducing response time while maintaining output quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and stores copies of generated outputs in a cache database for future retrieval. Instead of regenerating outputs for similar inputs, the system copies and returns cached results that match the current input, eliminating redundant computational work while preserving output quality through careful matching algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Use of energy by moving object

If the system caches outputs for quick retrieval, then computational costs are reduced, but the system must handle the complexity of matching similar inputs and managing cache validity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational costVSAvoidcaching mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex manual matching processes with an automated machine-learned model that efficiently compares new inputs against cached inputs. This automated approach reduces computational overhead by using vector similarity calculations and pre-processing techniques, making the caching mechanism more efficient despite its inherent complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the caching mechanism into distinct functional modules: input preprocessing, similarity matching, cache retrieval, and output validation. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system management by distributing complexity across specialized sub-components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If the system retrieves cached outputs, then response time improves, but user satisfaction may decrease if cached outputs are not fresh or relevant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoiduser satisfaction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts cache retrieval behavior based on input characteristics, user preferences, and output freshness. For time-sensitive queries, the system prioritizes fast cache retrieval, while for queries requiring up-to-date information, it triggers fresh generation. This dynamic approach balances response time with user satisfaction by adapting to different contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates user feedback mechanisms to evaluate cached output quality and relevance. When users interact with cached outputs, the system learns from these interactions and adjusts its caching strategy, prioritizing cache hits for high-satisfaction scenarios and fresh generation for low-satisfaction cases, thereby maintaining user satisfaction while leveraging caching benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260017495A1Generative AI Output Caching with Input Guidance
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US20260017495A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017495A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017495A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Example systems and methods are provided. A method can include receiving, by a computing system comprising one or more computing devices, a first input for a generative machine-learned model. The method can include identifying, by the computing system, from a first data structure comprising data indicative of a plurality of respective second inputs, one or more second inputs based on the first input. The method can include retrieving, by the computing system from a second data structure correlating the plurality of respective second inputs to a plurality of corresponding outputs generated by the generative machine-learned model based at least in part on the respective second inputs, an output corresponding to at least one second input of the one or more second inputs. The method can include outputting, by the computing system, the output corresponding to the at least one second input.