AI Ameliorative Output Selection via Loss Function Minimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Accurate selection of ameliorative outputs in artificial intelligence systems is challenging due to user preferences and can lead to frustrating and unsuccessful outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a server to generate ameliorative outputs based on both short-term and long-term indicators, incorporating user life element data to minimize a loss function, thereby selecting an optimal output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple ameliorative outputs are generated based on user preferences, then user satisfaction may improve, but selection accuracy deteriorates due to difficulty in choosing among multiple options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfactionVSAvoidselection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the selection problem by changing parameters from discrete output choices to continuous loss function minimization. Multiple ameliorative outputs are generated with different short-term and long-term indicator weights, and the optimal output is selected by minimizing a composite loss function that balances both time horizons, thereby resolving the contradiction between providing multiple options and maintaining selection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The loss function serves as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between multiple ameliorative outputs and the final selection. Instead of directly comparing multiple user-preferred outputs, the system uses the loss function as an intermediate evaluation layer that quantifies the trade-off between short-term and long-term indicators, enabling accurate selection among multiple options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If short-term indicators are prioritized in ameliorative output selection, then immediate user needs are met, but long-term outcomes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidlong-term outcome
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically balances short-term and long-term indicators through the loss function, which incorporates both time horizons. The ameliorative output selection is not static but adapts by minimizing the composite loss that includes both short-term responsiveness and long-term reliability, allowing the system to respond quickly while ensuring sustainable outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-defining the loss function structure that includes both short-term and long-term indicators before selection occurs. This preliminary setup ensures that long-term considerations are built into the selection criteria from the outset, preventing the prioritization of short-term gains at the expense of long-term reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If long-term indicators are prioritized in ameliorative output selection, then sustainable outcomes are achieved, but immediate user needs are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelong-term outcomeVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The dynamic loss function minimization process simultaneously considers both long-term reliability and short-term response time. By optimizing the composite loss function that includes both dimensions, the system achieves sustainable outcomes without sacrificing immediate user needs, as the selection process evaluates both time horizons concurrently rather than sequentially

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If user preferences are heavily weighted in output selection, then user satisfaction improves, but objective accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser satisfactionVSAvoidobjective accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter weighting approach by incorporating both user preferences and objective indicators into the loss function. Instead of relying solely on user preferences or objective accuracy, the loss function minimization process balances both aspects, transforming the selection into an optimization problem that achieves both user satisfaction and objective accuracy simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11929170B2Methods and systems for selecting an ameliorative output using artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US11929170B2 patent drawing
  • US11929170B2 patent drawing
  • US11929170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for selecting an ameliorative output using artificial intelligence includes at least a server configured to receive at least a prognostic output. At least a server is configured to generate a plurality of ameliorative outputs as a function of at least a prognostic output wherein the plurality of ameliorative outputs include at least a short-term indicator and at least a long-term indicator. At least a server is configured to receive at least a user life element datum wherein the at least a user life element datum includes at least a user life quality response. At least a server is configured to generate a loss function of the plurality of short-term indicators and the plurality of long-term indicators using at least a user life element datum. At least a server is configured to select at least an ameliorative output from a plurality of ameliorative outputs to minimize the loss function.