AI Phishing Lure Generation for Personalized Training at Scale

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity training tools face challenges in efficiently generating personalized phishing lures at scale, distinguishing between synthetic and manually generated phishing messages, and effectively detecting live phishing attacks.

Innovation Solution

A computing platform uses artificial intelligence, specifically generative pre-trained transformers (GPT2/GPT3), to generate personalized phishing lures based on personalization data, receive user feedback, and update the model, while also training an inbound message filtering system to distinguish between synthetic and manually generated phishing messages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual development of phishing training messages is used, then customization and effectiveness are improved, but resource consumption and deployment scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization of phishing training messagesVSAvoiddeployment scalability of phishing training messages
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses AI to automatically generate multiple phishing training message variants by copying and adapting patterns from real phishing messages, eliminating manual creation for each variant while maintaining customization through parameterized templates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs parameterized templates where variables such as sender name, recipient name, company name, and message content can be dynamically changed to generate customized phishing training messages at scale without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If generic phishing training messages are used, then deployment efficiency is improved, but training effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment efficiency of phishing training messagesVSAvoideffectiveness of phishing training messages
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by inserting personalized information (recipient name, company-specific details, role-specific content) into specific locations within the phishing message template, making each message locally adapted to the target while maintaining overall deployment efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If inbound messaging systems deflect all suspicious messages, then security is improved, but false deflection of legitimate messages increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of phishing messagesVSAvoidfalse deflection of legitimate messages
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary AI classification layer between the inbound messaging system and the deflection action, which analyzes message characteristics and confidence scores to determine whether to deflect, allowing legitimate messages to pass through while catching actual phishing attempts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If AI-generated synthetic phishing lures are used for training, then scalability and personalization are improved, but difficulty in distinguishing from real phishing messages increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability of phishing lure generationVSAvoiddetection of synthetic vs manual phishing lures
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where users report whether they believe a phishing message is real or synthetic, and where AI models analyze linguistic patterns to identify synthetic generation artifacts, continuously improving the ability to detect and distinguish synthetic lures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12500928B2Simulated phishing lure generation using artificial intelligence for improved cybersecurity
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
  • US12500928B2 patent drawing
  • US12500928B2 patent drawing
  • US12500928B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate to automated simulated phishing lure generation for cybersecurity training. The computing platform may receive personalization data. The computing platform may generate, using a phishing lure generation model, one or more simulated synthetic phishing lures based on the personalization data. The computing platform may send the one or more simulated synthetic phishing lures to one or more user devices and one or more commands directing the one or more user devices to display the one or more simulated synthetic phishing lures, which may cause the one or more user devices to display the one or more simulated synthetic phishing lures. The computing platform may receive, from the one or more user devices, feedback data corresponding to user interactions with the simulated one or more synthetic phishing lures. The computing platform may update, using the feedback data, the phishing lure generation model.