AI PHY Parameter Recommendation for WLAN Link and Interference Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless local area network (WLAN) methods lack dynamic mechanisms for stations (STAs) to obtain optimal transmission power and PHY parameter recommendations based on real-time network conditions and specific operational states, leading to suboptimal link quality, excessive interference, and privacy concerns.

Innovation Solution

A mechanism where access points (APs) provide AI/ML-based PHY parameter recommendations to STAs, considering current channel conditions and operational metrics, allowing STAs to make informed adjustments within acceptable link degradation limits, enhancing privacy through dynamic adaptation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transmission power is increased to improve link quality, then link quality is improved, but interference to neighboring devices increases and regulatory violations may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink qualityVSAvoidinterference to neighboring devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts transmission power parameters based on real-time channel conditions, link margin, and operational state. The AP monitors these parameters and modifies the STA's transmission power within acceptable ranges to maintain link quality while minimizing interference, resolving the contradiction between reliability and harmful factors through adaptive parameter changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the AP receives operational metrics from the STA, evaluates link quality, and provides recommendations for power adjustment. This closed-loop feedback system enables continuous optimization of transmission power to balance link quality improvement with interference reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If transmission power is decreased to reduce interference, then interference is reduced, but link quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference to neighboring devicesVSAvoidlink quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically modifies transmission power parameters based on real-time channel conditions and link margin measurements. When channel conditions permit, the AP reduces transmission power to minimize interference while maintaining sufficient link quality through adaptive parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic transmission power control that adapts to changing network conditions. The system transitions from static power levels to dynamic adjustment, allowing the STA to operate at optimal power levels that vary based on channel quality, distance, and interference conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If transmission power is increased to maintain connection quality, then link quality is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes energy consumption by dynamically adjusting transmission power parameters based on actual channel conditions and link margin. The system avoids unnecessary high power transmission by using adaptive power control, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining connection quality through intelligent parameter management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the STA to autonomously adjust its transmission power based on recommendations from the AP and its own operational state. This self-service mechanism allows the STA to optimize its energy consumption without requiring continuous external control, balancing connection quality maintenance with energy efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Object-generated harmful factors

If AP enforces transmission power constraints to control interference, then interference is controlled, but adaptability to individual STA needs is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference controlVSAvoidadaptability to individual STA needs
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements differentiated power control for different STAs based on their individual channel conditions, operational states, and link requirements. Instead of uniform power constraints, the system provides STA-specific power recommendations tailored to local conditions, thereby maintaining interference control while improving adaptability to individual needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, one-size-fits-all power constraints to dynamic, adaptive power management. The AP continuously monitors each STA's operational metrics and adjusts power recommendations in real-time, enabling the system to adapt to changing individual STA needs while maintaining overall interference control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250350548A1Artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML)-based physical layer parameter recommendation
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250350548A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350548A1 patent drawing
  • US20250350548A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides techniques for physical layer (PHY) parameter recommendation for improved link quality. An access point (AP) receives a recommendation request frame from a station (STA), the recommendation request frame comprising at least one of: one or more physical layer (PHY) parameters of the STA, a link margin of the STA, or one or more acceptable link degradation limits of the STA. The AP determines, based on the recommendation request frame, a recommended range for at least one of the PHY parameters, the recommended range being determined to maintain link performance within the acceptable link degradation limits. The AP transmits a recommendation response frame to the STA, the recommendation response frame comprising the recommended range, where the STA adjusts at least one PHY parameter based on the recommended range.