Structured AI Policy Engine for Real-Time Content Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing content moderation methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, inconsistent, and inflexible, struggling to keep up with the volume and fast-changing threats of user-generated content on online platforms.

Innovation Solution

A content safety platform utilizing a structured AI policy engine allows users to specify customizable and adaptable content safety policies through a structured syntax, leveraging AI and machine learning for efficient, real-time, and scalable content evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional human moderation methods are used, then content safety can be maintained through careful review, but the process becomes labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent safetyVSAvoidmoderation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human moderation with an automated AI-based content evaluation system. The system uses machine learning models to analyze user-generated content, automatically detecting policy violations without human intervention. This substitution eliminates the time-consuming nature of manual review while maintaining consistent application of safety policies across all content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The content moderation system performs self-evaluation through automated AI models that independently assess content against safety policies. The system serves itself by automatically detecting, classifying, and flagging violating content without requiring external human moderators for each piece of content, thereby reducing both time and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Stability of the object's composition

If human moderators review all content, then consistent policy application can be achieved, but the approach becomes labor-intensive and impractical for high volume content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy consistencyVSAvoidcontent processing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces human moderators with automated AI models that consistently apply safety policies to all content. The machine learning models are trained on policy guidelines and automatically evaluate content against these standards, ensuring uniform application across all user-generated content regardless of volume, thereby maintaining policy consistency while enabling high-throughput processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The AI-based moderation system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it evaluates text, images, and video content; detects various types of policy violations; and applies consistent safety standards across diverse content types. This multi-functional capability allows the system to maintain policy consistency while processing large volumes of diverse content that would be impractical for human moderators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If existing automated moderation systems are deployed, then processing speed can be improved, but the systems become difficult to deploy and maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemoderation speedVSAvoidsystem deployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between content upload and moderation evaluation. The system pre-processes content through automated evaluation pipelines that prepare data for analysis, managing the complexity of AI model deployment and maintenance. This intermediary structure simplifies the overall system architecture by organizing complex moderation tasks into manageable stages, making the system easier to deploy and maintain while maintaining high processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If traditional moderation systems are used, then basic content filtering can be performed, but the systems are slow to adapt to fast changing threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detectionVSAvoidthreat adaptation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The moderation system implements dynamic adaptability through continuously updating AI models that can rapidly respond to emerging threats. The system incorporates feedback loops where new threat patterns are learned and integrated into the evaluation criteria, allowing the moderation approach to evolve dynamically with changing content safety challenges rather than relying on static rule sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of content using AI models that are pre-trained on diverse threat patterns. By preparing and updating evaluation criteria in advance based on emerging threats, the system can quickly adapt to new types of violating content without requiring complete reconfiguration, thereby maintaining reliable threat detection while improving adaptation speed to fast-changing threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260050736A1Content safety platform
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 CLAVATA INC
  • US20260050736A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050736A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050736A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A structured specification of a content safety policy is received. The structured specification of the content safety policy conforms to a syntax. Content to be evaluated is received. The received content is evaluated using the structured specification of the content safety policy to determine whether the received content violates the content safety policy.