AI Presentation Assistant for Real-Time Interaction Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated systems lack effective means to provide real-time advice and optimization for presentations, especially in high-stakes scenarios like earnings webcasts, where unknown participant interactions and investor sentiment are critical factors.

Innovation Solution

A presentation assistance system that utilizes language models and historical presentation data to analyze and improve presentations at multiple stages, including script development, rehearsal, and delivery, by predicting likely interactions and providing real-time feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated systems are used to analyze presentations, then presentation quality can be improved through data-driven recommendations, but the complexity of the system increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepresentation qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides presentation analysis into multiple independent modules: script analysis module for content evaluation, delivery analysis module for non-verbal behavior, interaction prediction module for Q&A preparation, and real-time feedback module for live guidance. Each module processes specific aspects of presentation separately, making the overall complex system manageable and modular.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a presentation assistant as an intermediary system that bridges the gap between raw presentation data and actionable insights. This assistant aggregates information from multiple sources (historical presentations, audience analytics, language models) and translates them into coherent recommendations, simplifying the interface between complex analysis components and the presenter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If real-time analysis and feedback are provided during presentation delivery, then presentation effectiveness is improved, but the speed of processing and response time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepresentation effectivenessVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs extensive analysis of historical presentations, audience demographics, and potential interactions before the actual presentation occurs. By pre-processing this data and generating predicted interactions in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during live delivery, enabling real-time feedback without requiring instantaneous processing of all historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The presentation assistant operates continuously throughout the presentation lifecycle - during preparation, delivery, and post-event analysis. By maintaining continuous processing and learning from each presentation, the system optimizes its algorithms over time, improving processing efficiency and reducing real-time response requirements for subsequent presentations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If historical presentation data is collected and analyzed to generate predictions, then preparedness for unknown interactions is improved, but the quantity of data processing and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreparedness for unknown interactionsVSAvoiddata quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses on the most critical patterns and features from historical presentation data rather than processing all available data uniformly. By identifying and isolating key interaction patterns, common questions, and successful delivery techniques, the system reduces the volume of data that needs to be processed while maintaining high adaptability to unknown interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts data processing parameters based on the specific presentation context, audience type, and predicted interaction complexity. By changing the level of detail and scope of data analysis according to the situation, the system manages data quantity requirements while maintaining comprehensive preparedness for various scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of information

If multiple stages of analysis are applied to presentations, then the comprehensiveness of feedback is improved, but the time required for processing and system setup increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of feedbackVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis process is segmented into distinct stages: data collection, script analysis, delivery analysis, interaction prediction, and feedback generation. Each stage processes specific information independently and feeds into the next stage, allowing for systematic comprehensive analysis while managing processing time through staged execution rather than monolithic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250061270A1Computer-assisted interactive content presentation and real-time assistance
Publication Date: 2025.02.20 DIGITAL MEDIA INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US20250061270A1 patent drawing
  • US20250061270A1 patent drawing
  • US20250061270A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A presentation assistance system receives information about a presentation to be given and automatically provides feedback to improve the presentation either offline or in real time as the presentation unfolds using computer models, where a presentation is a collection of multi-media content, including but not limited to text, slides and graphics, and audio and video streams. The computer models may be trained based on prior presentations and performance metrics of relevant entities. In particular, the presentation includes interactions with audience members and computer models are used to generate likely participants and related interactions, such as questions or recommendations for improved interactions, relevant to the current presentation based on a set of machine learning and AI models, and, in particular, language models. The language model may be prompted with prior relevant questions to determine questions for the current presentation and evaluate the likelihood that the current presentation effectively answers them.