AI Process Defect Detection With Real-Time Image Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing process defect detection systems fail to detect defects in real-time and require manual inspection, making it difficult to optimize processes and prevent defective products, as they rely on post-process analysis and are not easily adaptable to on-site conditions.

Innovation Solution

An artificial intelligence-based system that uses a photographing module, machine learning model, and detection module to capture and analyze image data, recognize process changes, and generate defect information in real-time, allowing for immediate correction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sampling and inspection are performed after all work is completed, then defect detection is possible, but production time is lost and mass production of defective products cannot be prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary defect detection during the manufacturing process itself, not after completion. The photographing module captures images at each unit process stage, and the detection module identifies defects in real-time, allowing immediate correction before mass production of defective products occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by comparing work data with instruction data in real-time. When deviations are detected, the system provides immediate feedback to operators, enabling corrective actions during the process rather than after completion, thus preventing further defective production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual inspection and data collection are required, then defect analysis can be performed, but productivity decreases and real-time optimization is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect analysis capabilityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic defect detection and analysis without requiring manual intervention. The photographing module automatically captures images, the machine learning model automatically processes and analyzes the images, and the detection module automatically generates defect information, eliminating the need for manual inspection while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated optical and computational system. Instead of workers manually collecting data and analyzing defects, the system uses photographing modules, machine learning models, and automated detection algorithms to perform the same function with higher speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If work orders are established with many items, then comprehensive process control is achieved, but errors and defects increase and adaptability to on-site conditions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to on-site conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to on-site conditions by using machine learning models that can learn from actual production data. The system compares work data with instruction data in real-time and can identify deviations that require adaptive responses, allowing the manufacturing process to adjust to actual conditions while maintaining comprehensive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors and detects changes in process parameters by comparing actual work data with instructed parameters. When deviations are detected, the system can trigger parameter adjustments to maintain manufacturing precision while adapting to actual production conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of information

If post-process analysis is used for defect detection, then comprehensive defect information can be obtained, but real-time correction is impossible and defective products are already produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect information completenessVSAvoidtime for correction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs defect detection at each unit process stage before the entire manufacturing process is completed. By capturing images and analyzing defects in real-time during the process, the system enables preliminary detection that allows correction before defective products are fully produced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous defect detection throughout the manufacturing process rather than performing discrete post-process analysis. The photographing module continuously captures images, and the detection module continuously analyzes them, ensuring that defects are detected as they occur and can be corrected immediately, maintaining continuous useful action for quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12579634B2Real-time process defect detection automation system and method using machine learning model
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 CREFLE INC
  • US12579634B2 patent drawing
  • US12579634B2 patent drawing
  • US12579634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An artificial intelligence-based process defect detection system may include: a photographing module that collects image data by capturing a process that progresses on an object; a machine learning model that generates work data that is a result of recognizing and reading the object based on the image data; and a detection module that receives instruction data recorded regarding a process for an object optimized for product production, detects a defect or a non-defect by comparing the work data with the instruction data, and generates defect information when the process is defective.