AI-Assisted Production Advisory Models for Well-Flowline Failure Prediction
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing AI solutions in digital oil fields react to equipment failures after they occur, lacking proactive predictive capabilities.
Innovation Solution
A method combining physics-based models with machine learning to build, calibrate, and update models using real-time and historical data, enabling proactive failure prediction and optimization.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If AI solutions are based on data pattern recognition to detect equipment failures, then the system can identify problems that have already occurred, but it cannot predict failures before they occur
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by using physics-based models to simulate and predict equipment failures before they actually occur. The system performs virtual experiments and calculates failure probabilities in advance, allowing operators to take preventive measures before the failure happens, rather than waiting for pattern recognition to detect an already-occurred failure.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces physics-based models as an intermediary between raw sensor data and failure detection. These models serve as a mediator that simulates equipment behavior, compares simulated results with actual sensor data, and identifies deviations that indicate impending failures, enabling predictive rather than reactive failure detection.
2Measurement precision
If the system uses physics-based models with multiple calibration parameters to improve prediction accuracy, then the model can better represent real-world behavior, but the complexity of building and calibrating the model increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies feedback by using actual sensor data from the equipment to validate and calibrate the physics-based models. The system continuously compares simulated results with measured data, uses the discrepancies to adjust and refine model parameters, and iteratively improves model accuracy through this closed-loop feedback process.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying and calibrating multiple physics-based parameters (such as thermal conductivity, heat capacity, boundary conditions) to match actual equipment behavior. The system adjusts these parameters based on calibration data to optimize the model's predictive accuracy for specific equipment configurations.
Data Source
AI summary
A method includes receiving first data and building a first model of a well based at least partially upon the first data. The method also includes receiving second data and building a second model including a network of flowlines based at least partially upon the second data. At least one of the flowlines is connected to the well. The method also includes combining the first model and the second model to produce a combined model. The method also includes calibrating the combined model to produce a calibrated model. Calibrating the combined model includes receiving measured data, running a simulation of the combined model to produce simulated results, and adjusting a calibration parameter to cause the simulated results to match the measured data. The calibration parameter includes a productivity index of a fluid flowing out of the well. The method also includes updating the calibrated model to produce an updated model.


