AI Proficiency Identification System for Automated Gap Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in identifying underdeveloped proficiency areas across various aspects of life, leading to setbacks in achieving goals, due to the manual and inefficient nature of existing evaluation methods.

Innovation Solution

An automatic underdeveloped proficiency area identification system using a proficiency identification model that generates a user attribute set, selects an optimal model, and provides personalized proficiency development recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual self-evaluation is used to identify proficiency areas, then users can evaluate their own competencies, but users are unable to identify all proficiency gaps and the process is administratively burdensome and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual self-evaluation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing time for proficiency identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical evaluation process with an automated machine learning system. The proficiency identification model automatically analyzes user data from multiple sources (financial transactions, lifestyle data, social media) to identify proficiency gaps without requiring manual user input, thereby eliminating the time-consuming administrative burden while maintaining ease of use through automatic operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automatic self-service proficiency identification by using the proficiency identification model to autonomously analyze user-generated data and generate proficiency assessments. The model processes user data independently without requiring manual intervention, allowing the system to serve itself in identifying proficiency areas while reducing administrative overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If manual evaluation is used for proficiency area identification, then users can assess their competencies, but the process is susceptible to errors and may result in misidentification of underdeveloped proficiency areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-led competency assessmentVSAvoidaccuracy of proficiency area identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human evaluation with an automated machine learning-based proficiency identification model. This model objectively analyzes structured user data from multiple sources using algorithmic processing, eliminating human subjectivity and errors while improving the reliability and accuracy of proficiency area identification through consistent, data-driven assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the proficiency identification model continuously learns from user responses and validation data. Users can provide feedback on identified proficiency areas, and this feedback is used to retrain and improve the model's accuracy over time, creating a self-correcting system that enhances reliability through iterative improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive proficiency evaluation across all life aspects is implemented, then users receive complete proficiency assessment, but the system complexity and data processing requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of proficiency areasVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal proficiency identification model that can assess multiple proficiency areas (financial, health, education, employment) through a single unified system. The model is designed to handle diverse data types from multiple life aspects using the same core architecture, enabling comprehensive evaluation without proportionally increasing system complexity through modular, reusable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the comprehensive proficiency evaluation into distinct proficiency areas (financial, health, education, employment) that can be independently assessed and combined. Each proficiency area is evaluated separately using specialized data sources and metrics, then integrated into a holistic profile, reducing overall complexity by breaking down the comprehensive assessment into manageable modular components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If automated proficiency identification system is implemented, then processing time is reduced and accuracy is improved, but the extent and applications of such technology are still being explored and require systematic implementation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproficiency identification speedVSAvoidsystem implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-training the proficiency identification model with extensive user data and proficiency criteria before deployment. The model is pre-configured with knowledge of multiple proficiency areas and evaluation metrics, enabling it to quickly and accurately assess users upon deployment without requiring complex real-time configuration, thereby achieving high productivity while managing implementation complexity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250200664A1Generative artificial intelligence system for identification of underdeveloped proficiency areas
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250200664A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200664A1 patent drawing
  • US20250200664A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for identification of an underdeveloped proficiency area for a user. An example method includes generating, by the mining engine, a user attribute set. The example method further includes selecting, by the mining engine and based on the user attribute set, an optimal proficiency identification model. The example method further includes generating, by the multimodal engine and using the optimal proficiency identification model, a user proficiency profile comprising one or more user proficiency areas. The example method further includes identifying, by the multimodal engine and using the optimal proficiency identification model, an underdeveloped proficiency area. The example method further includes outputting, by communications hardware and based on the identified underdeveloped proficiency area, a proficiency development recommendation.