AI Query Response Customization Using Adapter Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI models consume substantial computing resources and time to customize outputs for individual user preferences, leading to increased computational load and inefficiency due to repeated re-prompts and resource-intensive training processes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing adapter models within AI models' architectures to fine-tune outputs based on user-specific style and formatting preferences, using training data sets generated from user documents, and providing prompt preambles when training criteria are not met, reducing the need for direct AI model retraining.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If AI models are retrained directly to customize outputs for individual user preferences, then customization accuracy is improved, but computational resource consumption and training time increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the customization task into two distinct components: (1) training a lightweight adapter model on user preference data to learn customization patterns, and (2) applying the trained adapter model to modify AI model outputs. This segmentation allows the heavy lifting of learning user preferences to be done once in the adapter, while the main AI model remains unchanged and can be reused for multiple users, significantly reducing computational resource consumption during inference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adapter model serves as an intermediary component between the user's preference data and the main AI model. Instead of directly retraining the large AI model for each user, the adapter model acts as a mediator that translates user preferences into output modifications. This intermediary approach enables customization without requiring substantial retraining of the main model, thus reducing computational overhead while maintaining customization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If AI models perform repeated re-prompts to adjust outputs, then response relevancy is improved, but response time and system latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse relevancyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by training the adapter model in advance on user preference data stored in the data store. Once trained, the adapter model contains pre-learned patterns of user preferences that can be applied directly to modify AI model outputs without requiring repeated iterative adjustments or re-prompts. This preliminary training enables the system to achieve response relevancy in a single pass, significantly reducing response time and eliminating the need for multiple back-and-forth interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If full AI model training is performed for each user, then output customization is improved, but system complexity and training overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput customizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system architecture is segmented into distinct components: the main AI model, the lightweight adapter model, the data store for user preferences, and the output generation system. This segmentation allows the adapter model to handle user-specific customization independently without complicating the main AI model. The adapter model's simplified structure and dedicated role in translating user preferences reduce overall system complexity while maintaining high adaptability for output customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adapter model implements local quality by focusing exclusively on learning and applying user preference patterns specific to each user, rather than attempting to modify the entire AI model. This localized approach allows the system to achieve high customization adaptability for individual users while keeping the main AI model unchanged and simple. Each user gets personalized output quality through their dedicated adapter model trained on their specific preference data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260023952A1Methods and systems for on the fly customized query responses using artificial intelligence
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260023952A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023952A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023952A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for customized query responses using artificial intelligence are provided. A first request to perform an operation associated with an artificial intelligence (AI) model is received from a first user of a platform. A first adapter model associated with at least one of the first user or the first contextual data pertaining to the first request is identified. A model pipeline associated with the AI model is updated to include the identified first adapter model. A prompt including the first request to perform the operation is provided as input to the first adapter model. An output of the first adapter model is used by the AI model. A first output of the AI model is obtained. A first response to the first request is provided to the user. The first response is based on the first output of the AI model.