AI Radiology Reporting via Synthetic Data Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Nuclear imaging systems face challenges in efficiently training artificial intelligence processes for medical image analysis due to the need for large volumes of curated data and the complexity of ensuring robustness across various image scanning devices and settings, making the data collection and validation process time-consuming and expensive.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that utilizes a machine learning model trained with clinical characterizations and anatomical associations from speech data and image scans, employing natural language processing and convolutional neural networks to classify features and generate anatomical associations, which can be used to improve the AI's performance and automate image findings with clinical annotations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If large volumes of curated training data are used to train AI processes, then the accuracy and reliability of AI classification improves, but the time and cost required for data collection and validation increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI classification reliabilityVSAvoiddata collection and validation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically generating synthetic training data through simulation of imaging devices and clinical workflows before actual AI training is needed. This pre-generated data eliminates the time-consuming manual data collection and validation process while providing sufficient training material for reliable AI classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of real clinical data through synthetic generation methods, producing training datasets that replicate the characteristics and variability of actual medical imaging data without requiring physical collection and annotation of real patient data, thus reducing time and resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If extensive data collection is performed to ensure AI robustness across various imaging devices and settings, then the adaptability of AI processes improves, but the complexity and cost of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI robustness across devicesVSAvoiddata collection process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by creating a multi-functional synthetic data generation platform that can simulate multiple imaging device types, scanning parameters, and clinical scenarios within a single system. This unified approach provides broad adaptability training without requiring separate complex data collection processes for each device and setting combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying simulation parameters (imaging device settings, scan protocols, patient characteristics) to generate diverse training data. This controlled parameter manipulation achieves comprehensive adaptability training while maintaining process simplicity through automated parameter adjustment rather than manual data collection across multiple devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If manual annotation of medical image features is performed by clinical experts, then the quality and accuracy of training data improves, but the productivity and efficiency of the training process decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data qualityVSAvoidtraining process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by implementing automated synthetic data generation and annotation capabilities that create training datasets without requiring manual intervention from clinical experts. The system self-generates labeled training data through simulation, maintaining high quality through algorithmic accuracy while dramatically improving productivity by eliminating manual annotation bottlenecks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system substitutes the mechanical process of manual expert annotation with an automated computational system that generates and labels training data through algorithmic processes. This replacement maintains data quality through sophisticated generation models while eliminating the time and resource constraints of manual human annotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11386991B2Methods and apparatus for artificial intelligence informed radiological reporting and model refinement
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA INC
  • US11386991B2 patent drawing
  • US11386991B2 patent drawing
  • US11386991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for detecting and classifying clinical features in medical images are disclosed. Natural language processes are applied to speech received from a dictation system to determine clinical and anatomical information for a medical image being viewed. In some examples, gaze location information identifying an eye position is received, as well as an image position for the medical image being viewed. Features of the medical image are detected and classified based on machine learning models. Anatomical associations are generated based on one or more of the classifications, the anatomical information, the gaze information, and the image position. The machine learning models can be trained based on the anatomical associations. In some examples, reports are generated based on the anatomical associations.