AI Reading Layout Using Vertical Sense-Group Arrangement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional arrangements of graphics, images, text, symbols, or objects lead to inefficient reading due to excessive eye movement, frequent line changes, and potential errors, causing eye fatigue and reduced reading efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Reorganizing these elements into first- and second-level units, arranged in non-linear patterns along curves or straight lines, optimizing the layout to minimize eye movement and improve visual recognition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional lateral-first-and-then-longitudinal arrangement is used, then the arrangement follows conventional typography standards, but eye movement distance increases and reading efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading efficiencyVSAvoideye movement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional horizontal (lateral) arrangement to vertical (longitudinal) arrangement as the primary dimension, fundamentally changing the reading direction to match the natural elliptical shape of human field of view. This dimensional change allows the eye to scan content more efficiently within its natural visual range, reducing the need for excessive lateral eye movements and improving reading efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the arrangement parameters by prioritizing longitudinal positioning over lateral positioning. Instead of arranging content row-by-row (lateral-first), the system arranges content column-by-column (longitudinal-first), effectively swapping the primary and secondary arrangement dimensions. This parameter change optimizes the layout to match human visual characteristics, reducing eye movement distance and time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional arrangement is used, then content is displayed in conventional format, but sense groups exceed field of view requiring multiple gazes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition accuracyVSAvoidnumber of gazes required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By switching from horizontal to vertical arrangement as the primary dimension, the patent ensures that sense groups and long words are arranged along the longitudinal axis, which better fits the elliptical human field of view. This allows complete sense groups to be captured within a single gaze, improving recognition accuracy and eliminating the need for multiple gazes to understand complete meanings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments content into meaningful units (sense groups, words, characters) and arranges them in longitudinal columns rather than horizontal rows. This segmentation and vertical arrangement ensures that each column contains complete semantic units that fit within the viewer's field of view, allowing single-gaze recognition of complete sense groups and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If traditional lateral arrangement is used, then typography conventions are maintained, but eye fatigue increases due to excessive movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereading comfortVSAvoideye movement duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental arrangement parameter from lateral (horizontal) to longitudinal (vertical) as the primary dimension. This parameter change reduces the total distance eyes must travel across the page, as vertical scanning requires less cumulative eye movement than horizontal scanning across multiple long lines. The result is reduced eye fatigue and improved reading comfort while maintaining conventional typography standards through adaptive layout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of substance

If traditional arrangement is used, then paper utilization follows standard formatting, but paper waste increases due to inefficient space use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepaper consumptionVSAvoidinformation density
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension as the primary arrangement axis, allowing content to be packed more efficiently from top to bottom of the page. This vertical-first arrangement maximizes the use of available page height, reducing white space and increasing information density. By arranging content in longitudinal columns rather than horizontal rows, the system achieves better paper utilization and reduces waste without sacrificing readability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12632647B2Artificial intelligence assisted recognition method and device
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 ZHOU CHUNDA
  • US12632647B2 patent drawing
  • US12632647B2 patent drawing
  • US12632647B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improving the efficiency of human or machine reading and recognizing graphics, images, text, symbols, spaces, or objects is a very important issue. For example, fast reading can help people get information quickly. The invention achieves one or more of the following objectives by means of graphics, images, text, symbols, spaces or objects arranged in different arrangements: reducing the speed, frequency, amplitude, distance of eye movement, improving the efficiency of visual recognition, achieving rapid reading, improving the utilization rate of paper and display device, reducing the use of paper, reducing the felling of trees, and protecting the environment.