AI Recommendation Multi-Indicator Aggregation Accuracy
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing AI-based recommendation systems often recommend information that users do not actually like, leading to inaccurate recommendations and inefficient use of computing and communication resources, due to conflicting optimization objectives and implicit biases in the model training process.
Innovation Solution
An AI-based recommendation method that uses multi-level mapping and multi-indicator aggregation processing to combine user features and candidate information features, performing deep optimization of expert networks and introducing a multi-indicator uncertainty factor to improve model accuracy and user engagement.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If linear sorting model or depth sorting model is used for click-through rate estimation, then the recommendation system can operate with simpler processing, but the recommendation accuracy deteriorates and causes unnecessary consumption of computing and communication resources
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the recommendation process into multiple independent sorting models (e.g., click-through rate model, interest matching model, user engagement model) that operate in parallel. Each model focuses on a specific aspect of recommendation quality, allowing the system to achieve high overall accuracy without requiring a single overly complex model. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by distributing processing complexity across multiple specialized components rather than concentrating it in one complex system.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a multi-dimensional evaluation framework that assesses candidate information across multiple dimensions (click-through rate, interest matching, user engagement, diversity) simultaneously. This dimensional expansion allows the system to evaluate recommendations comprehensively without increasing the complexity of individual evaluation metrics. By adding evaluation dimensions rather than increasing metric complexity, the system achieves higher accuracy while maintaining manageable processing complexity.
2Measurement precision
If multi-level mapping and multi-indicator aggregation processing are implemented, then recommendation accuracy improves significantly, but the device complexity and computational resources required increase
Solution Approach 1:
The complex multi-level mapping and aggregation process is segmented into distinct modular components: feature extraction module, multi-level mapping module, multiple sorting model evaluation module, and aggregation module. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently optimized and maintained. This segmentation reduces system complexity by breaking down the monolithic complex process into manageable, specialized components that can be developed and deployed independently.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent designs universal sorting models and aggregation mechanisms that can handle multiple evaluation indicators (click-through rate, interest matching, engagement metrics) through a unified framework. Rather than creating separate specialized systems for each indicator, the universal framework processes all indicators through consistent multi-level mapping and aggregation logic, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high recommendation accuracy across different metric types.
3Adaptability or versatility
If multiple sorting models are used to evaluate candidate information from different dimensions, then the comprehensive evaluation capability improves, but the computational resources and processing time increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary filtering and feature extraction before applying multiple sorting models. Candidate information is pre-processed to extract relevant features and eliminate obviously unsuitable options before entering the multi-model evaluation stage. This preliminary action reduces the number of candidates that require full multi-dimensional evaluation, thereby maintaining comprehensive evaluation capability while significantly reducing computational resource consumption and processing time.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements a staged evaluation approach where not all sorting models are applied to all candidate information equally. Instead, the system applies different levels of evaluation intensity based on initial screening results: high-potential candidates receive full multi-model evaluation, while lower-potential candidates receive simplified evaluation. This partial application of comprehensive evaluation maintains versatility for important cases while improving overall processing efficiency by avoiding excessive computation on unlikely candidates.
Data Source
AI summary
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide an artificial intelligence (AD-based recommendation method and apparatus, an electronic device, and a computer-readable storage medium. The method includes obtaining a plurality of pieces of candidate recommendation information corresponding to a to-be-recommended object and forming a fusion feature corresponding to each of the plurality of pieces of candidate recommendation information. Then, the method includes performing multi-level mapping processing on the fusion feature to obtain scores corresponding to a plurality of indicators of each of the plurality of pieces of candidate recommendation information. The method may also include performing multi-indicator aggregation processing on the scores to obtain comprehensive scores and sorting the plurality of pieces of candidate recommendation information in a descending order according to the comprehensive score. Then piece of candidate recommendation information ranked at the top is selected.


