AI Repair Step Recommendation for Troubleshooting Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing troubleshooting systems for electrical and mechanical products require users to follow sequential instructions, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistent results due to repeated steps and lack of personalization based on previous user actions.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing artificial intelligence and machine learning to streamline and customize troubleshooting workflows through natural language, voice, text, and click interfaces, learning from user interactions to recommend relevant tests and repairs based on user history and demographics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If sequential troubleshooting instructions are provided, then users can follow step-by-step procedures to diagnose and repair issues, but users must repeat unnecessary steps and spend excessive time on irrelevant procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetroubleshooting workflow efficiencyVSAvoidtime spent on unnecessary steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The troubleshooting guide dynamically adapts its content based on user inputs, device specifications, and troubleshooting history. The system reorders and filters steps in real-time, transforming a static sequential guide into a dynamic personalized workflow that responds to user actions and device characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The troubleshooting guide is segmented into modular components that can be independently selected and presented based on relevance. Instead of presenting all steps in a fixed sequence, the system divides the troubleshooting process into relevant subsets tailored to each user's specific situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If comprehensive troubleshooting documentation is provided, then all possible issues can be addressed, but the voluminous documentation becomes overwhelming and difficult to navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of troubleshooting coverageVSAvoidcomplexity of troubleshooting documentation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and presents only the relevant troubleshooting steps needed for each specific situation, separating essential information from unnecessary content. This extraction process filters out voluminous irrelevant documentation while maintaining comprehensive coverage of necessary procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The troubleshooting documentation provides different levels of detail and focus based on local conditions - user skill level, device type, and specific symptoms. Each user receives customized content with appropriate depth and scope for their particular situation rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If standardized troubleshooting procedures are used, then consistency can be maintained across different users, but the procedures cannot adapt to individual user actions or experiences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of troubleshooting resultsVSAvoidadaptability to user history and demographics
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops that track user actions, inputs, and troubleshooting history. This feedback is used to continuously adapt and personalize the troubleshooting guide, maintaining consistency through structured procedures while adapting to individual user patterns and experiences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The troubleshooting system serves multiple functions simultaneously - it provides standardized procedures for consistency while also personalizing content based on user demographics, history, and real-time inputs. The same system adapts to different user skill levels, device types, and troubleshooting contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If users attempt troubleshooting before consulting published guides, then users can perform initial diagnostics, but they repeat steps already done and create inefficiencies in the troubleshooting process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetroubleshooting process efficiencyVSAvoidloss of troubleshooting work already performed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures and stores user actions and troubleshooting results as preliminary data before generating personalized recommendations. This preliminary action tracking ensures that subsequent troubleshooting steps build upon previous work rather than repeating it, preserving valuable diagnostic information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from user-reported troubleshooting actions to adjust and personalize the guide, ensuring that previously performed steps are not repeated. The feedback mechanism tracks what users have already done and uses this information to streamline the remaining troubleshooting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12608686B2Recommending a repair step to perform
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US12608686B2 patent drawing
  • US12608686B2 patent drawing
  • US12608686B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The system obtains a first representation of a troubleshooting guide associated with a first issue experienced by a first device. The first representation includes a first plurality of nodes and a first plurality of edges. A node indicates a troubleshooting procedure, and an edge indicates a result of the troubleshooting procedure, such as a testing step or repair step. The system determines a subset of the first plurality of edges indicating the repair step and converts the subset of the first plurality of edges into multiple repair nodes to obtain a second representation. A repair node indicates the repair step resolving the first issue. The second representation includes the first plurality of nodes and the multiple repair nodes. Based on the second representation, the system trains an artificial intelligence to provide a most likely repair step to resolve a second issue without requiring performance of the testing step.