AI Robotic Process Configuration for Automated Lending Workflows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lending transactions face challenges such as opacity and asymmetry of information, moral hazard, complexity in application and negotiation processes, burdensome regulatory regimes, and difficulties in determining collateral value and financial health of entities.

Innovation Solution

A lending transaction enablement platform with integrated microservices including data collection, blockchain, and smart contract services, utilizing IoT, crowdsourcing, and social network analytics to monitor assets and entities, automate interest rate adjustments, and facilitate robotic process automation for negotiation and loan management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional manual processes are used for lending transactions, then human judgment and flexibility are maintained, but information asymmetry and opacity increase, and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation asymmetryVSAvoidmanual processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated robotic process automation (RPA) systems that collect, analyze, and evaluate lending data through software agents. These digital agents access multiple data sources, perform credit assessments, and generate decisions without human intervention, thereby reducing information asymmetry while increasing automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where RPA agents monitor lending transactions, collect data from external sources, analyze outcomes, and refine their decision-making algorithms. This feedback mechanism ensures that information asymmetry is progressively reduced as the system learns from actual transaction data and improves its assessment accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If complex manual negotiation and application processes are used, then flexibility in handling unique cases is maintained, but processing time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the lending process into distinct modular stages: data collection, credit assessment, negotiation, approval, and monitoring. Each stage is handled by specialized RPA agents with specific functions. This segmentation enables parallel processing of multiple applications simultaneously, dramatically increasing productivity while managing complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The RPA system implements universal standardized processes that can handle diverse lending cases through a common framework. The same automated agents process different loan types (personal loans, mortgages, business loans) using consistent criteria and workflows, thereby increasing processing speed while reducing operational complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional lending systems are used, then established procedures are followed, but regulatory compliance burden and information opacity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual compliance checking with automated RPA agents that systematically verify regulatory requirements, anti-money laundering rules, and lending regulations. These digital agents automatically cross-check applicant data against regulatory databases, generate compliance reports, and ensure adherence to legal requirements, thereby improving reliability while managing system complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary RPA agents that act as mediators between the lending process and regulatory requirements. These agents translate complex regulatory rules into automated checklists and validation protocols, serving as an intermediary layer that simplifies compliance monitoring while maintaining high reliability through systematic rule enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If manual collateral valuation and financial health assessment are used, then expert judgment is applied, but determination accuracy and processing time are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollateral valuation accuracyVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universal automated valuation models that can assess diverse collateral types (real estate, vehicles, equipment, inventory) using standardized algorithms. These RPA agents access multiple data sources (market prices, appraisal databases, asset registries) and apply consistent valuation methodologies across different asset classes, thereby improving measurement precision while reducing assessment time through parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual expert appraisal with automated RPA agents that use algorithmic models to evaluate collateral value and assess borrower financial health. These digital agents analyze financial statements, credit histories, and market data instantaneously, providing accurate measurements without the time constraints of manual review while maintaining consistency through standardized algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11586177B2Robotic process selection and configuration
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 STRONG FORCE TX PORTFOLIO 2018 LLC
  • US11586177B2 patent drawing
  • US11586177B2 patent drawing
  • US11586177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for selection and configuration of a robotic process includes a data input module to receive a stream of inputs relating to a user engaged in a task of interest, an input analysis module to analyze the stream of inputs and provide a series of timestamped actions and associated action parameters, and a component selection module to select a component of an AI solution for use in an automated robotic process, based on, at least in part, an action of the series of actions, the associated action parameters, or the components ability to simulate one or more of the actions in the series of actions.