AI-Scored Tiered Data Exchange for Bandwidth Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data exchange platforms lack a tiered system, leading to inefficiencies such as significant bandwidth usage, delayed information exchange, and unequal access to valuable data, as users tend to submit diluted data to avoid sharing their most valuable information, resulting in little additional value for investors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a tiered-based data exchange system that authenticates users, scores their data, and assigns tiers based on data quality, allowing users to receive targeted and valuable information in return, thereby incentivizing the submission of high-quality data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a universal data exchange system is implemented where all users can access all data, then data accessibility is improved, but bandwidth consumption increases significantly and data quality deteriorates due to diluted data submission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accessibilityVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments users into different tiers based on their data contribution quality and quantity. Tier 1 users receive comprehensive data access, while Tier 2 and Tier 3 users receive progressively limited access. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by restricting universal access (reducing bandwidth) while maintaining differentiated accessibility for high-value contributors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing different data access levels to different user segments. High-quality data contributors (Tier 1) receive high-quality comprehensive data, while lower-tier users receive limited or diluted data. This ensures data quality remains high for core users while reducing overall bandwidth consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If users are incentivized to submit more data, then data quantity increases, but data quality decreases due to diluted or duplicate submissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata quantityVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where users receive recognition and incentives based on the quality and impact of their data submissions. This feedback loop encourages users to submit high-quality data rather than quantity, as the incentive structure rewards meaningful contributions that improve overall data quality metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of data valuation from quantity-based to quality-based scoring. By introducing quality metrics and impact assessments, the system transforms the incentive structure to reward high-quality submissions, thereby improving data quality while maintaining acceptable data quantity through targeted encouragement of valuable contributions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If data exchange is delayed to filter quality data, then data quality improves, but information timeliness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidinformation timeliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing quality criteria and scoring frameworks before data exchange occurs. Quality metrics are defined in advance, allowing rapid assessment of incoming data against predetermined standards. This enables quick filtering and validation without significant delays, maintaining both quality and timeliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic quality assessment that adapts to the nature and urgency of data requests. For time-sensitive data, the system applies expedited quality checks; for less critical data, more comprehensive validation is applied. This dynamic approach ensures data quality is maintained while preserving information timeliness based on contextual requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250299252A1Systems and methods for tiered-based information provision
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250299252A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299252A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299252A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described herein for a tiered-based information provision. Such systems and methods may include authenticating a first user of a plurality of users configured to access a data exchange platform and retrieving a profile associated with the first user including an initial tier. The system receives first data supplied by the first user and stores the first data in a data structure communicatively coupled to the data exchange platform. After receiving and storing the first data, the system determines a score for the first data according to existing data in the data structure. Based on the score, the system determines an updated tier assigned to the profile associated with the first user. The system transmits second data to the first user, the second data including data received from a subset of users from the plurality of users that correspond to the updated tier.