AI Security System with Mixed Reality Interface for Dynamic Breach Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional security systems face challenges in detecting and addressing potential security breaches due to increasing frequency and severity of cybersecurity incidents, particularly in automated and digitized environments, necessitating a more efficient cybersecurity solution.

Innovation Solution

A security system utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for dynamic detection of potential security breaches, combined with a mixed reality interface to facilitate decision-making, which includes authentication through cryptographic techniques, ring signature analysis, and generation of interaction ontologies for anomaly detection and response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication methods are used to verify interaction requests, then security verification is provided, but the system cannot detect sophisticated security breaches in automated environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity detection capabilityVSAvoidability to detect automated breaches
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static authentication to dynamic anomaly detection by continuously learning from interaction patterns. The ML models adapt to new breach techniques in real-time, making the security system dynamically responsive rather than relying on fixed authentication rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameters from binary authentication (valid/invalid) to continuous anomaly scoring. By analyzing multiple interaction parameters simultaneously and assigning anomaly scores, the system can detect sophisticated breaches that traditional parameter-based authentication misses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If AI/ML models analyze all interaction requests in real-time, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the analysis process into multiple stages: initial authentication filter, anomaly scoring for suspicious requests, and full ML analysis only for high-risk interactions. This segmented approach maintains high detection accuracy while reducing overall system complexity by applying different levels of analysis selectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial analysis to all requests (basic authentication) and excessive/detailed analysis only when necessary (full ML anomaly detection). This selective depth of analysis achieves high precision for critical detections while avoiding the complexity of analyzing every single request at maximum detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If comprehensive analysis of all interaction requests is performed, then security breach detection improves, but processing speed and response time decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreach detection reliabilityVSAvoidrequest processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different analysis qualities to different requests based on their risk characteristics. Low-risk requests receive quick authentication-only processing, while high-risk requests receive comprehensive ML analysis. This local differentiation of analysis quality maintains high detection reliability for critical threats while preserving overall processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If cryptographic authentication techniques are used for all interactions, then security is enhanced, but processing overhead and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses cryptographic authentication universally for all requests (providing baseline security) while using ML anomaly detection selectively only for suspicious interactions. This multi-functional approach ensures authentication security for every request while avoiding the excessive computational overhead of applying full ML analysis universally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12088604B2Security system for dynamic detection of attempted security breaches using artificial intelligence, machine learning, and a mixed reality graphical interface
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US12088604B2 patent drawing
  • US12088604B2 patent drawing
  • US12088604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A security system environment that uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) (collectively “AI/ML”) to provide dynamic detection of potential security breaches and a mixed realty interface to decision the potential security breaches.