AI Sensor Recalibration Using Standard Measurement Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual recalibration of numerous sensors in technical installations is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly due to the need for expert-level comparison of sensor readings with standard measurements, often resulting in unnecessary recalibration when errors are within acceptable margins.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing an artificial intelligence model trained on calibration data to automatically determine calibration errors and generate feedback signals for recalibration, reducing the need for human intervention by analyzing sensor and standard measurement device readings using image processing and machine learning algorithms like KNN, and providing automated notification and instruction for recalibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual recalibration of sensors is performed by comparing readings with standard measurement devices, then measurement precision is maintained, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor calibration accuracyVSAvoidrecalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system performs self-calibration by automatically comparing its readings with standard measurement devices and adjusting its own calibration parameters without requiring manual intervention from engineers, thereby reducing recalibration time while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of comparing sensor readings with standard devices with an automated electronic system that uses processors to analyze data and generate calibration signals, eliminating the need for manual engineering intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual recalibration is performed with high expertise requirements, then calibration accuracy is ensured, but labor costs and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration error determination accuracyVSAvoidrecalibration operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines calibration errors and generates correction signals without requiring engineers to manually analyze readings or understand calibration criteria, making the operation simple while maintaining accuracy through automated expert-level processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated calibration management system as an intermediary between sensors and standard measurement devices, which handles the complex task of comparing readings, determining errors, and generating calibration signals, thereby simplifying the operator's role

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If sensors are recalibrated frequently to ensure accuracy, then measurement reliability is improved, but resource wastage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor measurement reliabilityVSAvoidrecalibration resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic recalibration scheduling that adjusts calibration frequency based on actual sensor performance degradation rates and process criticality, rather than using fixed intervals, thereby optimizing the balance between reliability and resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor readings and compares them with standard measurement devices to provide feedback on calibration status, enabling recalibration only when actually needed rather than on a fixed schedule, thus reducing unnecessary resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If manual comparison of sensor readings with standard devices is performed, then calibration error detection accuracy is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration error detection accuracyVSAvoidrecalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal calibration management system that can handle multiple sensor types, processes, and standard measurement devices through a single integrated platform, reducing overall system complexity by consolidating functions rather than requiring separate manual procedures for each sensor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240312060A1Method and system for recalibrating plurality of sensors in technical installation
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 SIEMENS AG
  • US20240312060A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312060A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312060A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a system of recalibrating a plurality of sensors in a technical installation is provided. The method includes determining, by the processing unit, a first reading associated with a sensor of a plurality of sensor and a second reading associated with a standard measurement device. The method further includes determining, by the processing unit, whether the sensor is in an uncalibrated state by application of an artificial intelligence model on the first reading and the second reading. The method further includes outputting, by the processing unit, a notification to a user based on a determination that the sensor is in the uncalibrated state.