AI Sensor Network for Dynamic Threat Characterization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cybersecurity systems struggle to effectively monitor and track cyber-physical assets, especially when changes occur, such as additions or reconfigurations, which require manual updates prone to errors and costly. Additionally, existing systems lack the ability to detect and track malicious activity across the broader internet, particularly from actors who obfuscate their activity.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for AI-controlled sensor networks that employ spatio-temporal context analysis to dynamically characterize threat states. This includes using diverse sensors for detecting suspicious transmissions, building event knowledge graphs, and implementing active response capabilities. The system also integrates data from location-aware sensors, physical security systems, and real-world events to provide comprehensive threat detection and response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual updates are performed to track asset changes, then asset information can be updated, but the process is costly and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of asset informationVSAvoidcost and complexity of update process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-updating of asset information through sensor networks that automatically detect and report changes in asset states, eliminating the need for manual scanning and updating processes. The sensor nodes autonomously monitor assets and trigger updates when changes are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical scanning processes are replaced with automated sensor-based detection systems that continuously monitor assets and transmit data electronically, substituting human-operated mechanical systems with automated electronic monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If traditional IP-based scanning is used to monitor cyber assets, then scanning can be performed, but malicious actors can obfuscate their activity by making systems appear benign

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning coverageVSAvoiddetection accuracy of malicious activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from traditional IP-based scanning to multi-dimensional monitoring that incorporates physical location data, sensor readings, and contextual information. This adds spatial and environmental dimensions to cyber monitoring, enabling detection of malicious activity that attempts to obfuscate itself through IP address camouflage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor nodes perform multiple functions simultaneously including cyber scanning, physical environment monitoring, location tracking, and contextual data collection. This multi-functionality enables cross-validation of data sources to identify malicious activity that attempts to appear benign in any single dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive sensor networks are deployed for threat detection, then threat detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The comprehensive sensor network is divided into distributed autonomous sensor nodes that each perform localized monitoring and processing. Each node independently manages its own data collection, analysis, and reporting, reducing the complexity burden on central system architecture while maintaining comprehensive threat detection capability across the network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250175456A1Ai-controlled sensor network for threat mapping and characterization and risk adjusted response
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 QOMPLX INC
  • US20250175456A1 patent drawing
  • US20250175456A1 patent drawing
  • US20250175456A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for an AI-controlled sensor network for threat mapping and characterization. The system deploys a network of honeypots and sensors across various geographic locations and network segments, collecting and aggregating data on network traffic and potential threats. An AI orchestrator analyzes this data using advanced machine learning models, generating dynamic honeypot profiles and a comprehensive threat landscape. The system can adapt in real-time to emerging threats, optimize resource allocation, and provide actionable intelligence. By correlating data across multiple points, the system offers enhanced threat detection capabilities and proactive cybersecurity measures, surpassing traditional security information and event management (SIEM) tools.