AI Site Visit Report Engine for Real-Time Clinical Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current site visit reports in clinical studies are manually reviewed and often delayed, leading to inefficiencies in identifying compliance issues and adverse events, which can result in delayed remedial actions and increased regulatory risks.

Innovation Solution

An automated site visit report engine that uses natural language processing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence to analyze responses in real-time during site visits, providing immediate feedback and alerts for compliance and adverse events, enabling real-time remedial actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review of site visit reports is used, then expertise and contextual understanding are maintained, but review time and delay are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance detection accuracyVSAvoidreport review time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

An AI-based natural language processing system is introduced as an intermediary between the site visit report data and the human specialist reviewer. The system automatically processes unstructured free text data, identifies compliance issues and adverse events, and presents structured findings to reviewers, thereby reducing manual review time while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical review process with an automated AI-based NLP system that can process and analyze site visit report data at scale, significantly reducing the time required for compliance detection while maintaining or improving accuracy through consistent application of compliance rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If real-time automated analysis is implemented, then feedback speed and productivity are improved, but system complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance evaluation speedVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The NLP system is designed to perform multiple functions including automated analysis of free text data, identification of compliance issues, detection of adverse events, and generation of structured reports. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single platform, managing complexity while delivering comprehensive real-time analysis capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If detailed manual review of all SVR responses is conducted, then detection precision is improved, but resource consumption and time loss increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection precisionVSAvoidreviewer time per report
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and prioritizes only the most relevant compliance issues and adverse events from the comprehensive site visit report data using NLP techniques. By filtering and extracting only critical findings rather than requiring review of all responses, the system maintains high detection precision while significantly reducing the time reviewers need to invest in each report.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20220359048A1Ai and ML assisted system for determining site compliance using site visit report
Publication Date: 2022.11.10 IQVIA INC
  • US20220359048A1 patent drawing
  • US20220359048A1 patent drawing
  • US20220359048A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems to automatically construct a clinical study site visit report (SVR), conduct the SVR, evaluate the SVR in real-time, and provide feedback while the SVR is being conducted. Responses to the SVR include user-selectable answers and natural language notes. Each response is evaluated as it is submitted based on a combination of pre-configured rules and a computer-trained model. If an anomaly is detected and is not already captured in the SVR, an alert is generated during performance of the SVR. The alert may include recommended remedial action.