AI Slide and Block Quality Verification for Tumor Sequencing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current genomic sequencing workflows for tumors are inefficient due to the manual and time-consuming process of selecting the best slides or sections for sequencing and verifying the adequacy of tumor tissue in samples.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine learning models to verify slide and block quality by assessing tumor content, purity, and necrosis, providing a quality score for selecting the most suitable FFPE blocks and slides for molecular testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pathologists manually review materials to select the best slides or sections for sequencing, then they can identify suitable tissue blocks, but the process becomes time-consuming and challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of slide and block selectionVSAvoidtime required for manual review
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical review process with an automated machine learning system. The ML model automatically analyzes digital images of tissue blocks and slides, evaluating tumor content, purity, and necrosis without human intervention, thereby eliminating time loss while maintaining or improving selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the ML model to autonomously assess and rank tissue blocks based on predefined quality criteria. The model independently identifies the best blocks for sequencing without requiring pathologist review, making the system self-sufficient in the selection task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If pathologists manually verify tumor tissue adequacy in chosen blocks, then they can ensure sufficient tumor content, but the process is challenging and prone to errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of tumor content verificationVSAvoidcomplexity of verification process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual verification with automated machine learning analysis. The ML model consistently evaluates tumor content, purity, and necrosis using standardized algorithms, eliminating human error and variability while simplifying the verification process into an automated computational task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides quantitative feedback through quality scores and tumor content measurements for each evaluated block. This objective feedback mechanism allows for reliable verification by comparing measured values against predefined thresholds, reducing complexity through automated decision rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If traditional workflow processes are used for genomic sequencing, then standard procedures are followed, but inefficiencies and time delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of genomic sequencing workflowVSAvoidtime delay in sequencing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary assessment of all tissue blocks before the sequencing decision is made. The ML model pre-evaluates tumor content, purity, and necrosis in advance, allowing the workflow to proceed directly to sequencing with the best blocks already identified, eliminating time delays associated with manual review during the sequencing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated ML-based selection system replaces manual pathologist review, dramatically increasing productivity by processing and evaluating blocks much faster than human reviewers can, thereby reducing overall workflow time while maintaining quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4305591B1Systems and methods for artificial intelligence powered molecular workflow verifying slide and block quality for testing
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 PAIGE AI INC
  • EP4305591B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4305591B1 patent drawingFigure 1C
  • EP4305591B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for verifying slide and block quality for testing. The method may comprise receiving a collection of one or more digital images at a digital storage device. The collection may be associated with a tissue block and corresponding to an instance. The method may comprise applying a machine learning model to the collection to identify a presence or an absence of an attribute, determining an amount or a percentage of tissue with the attribute from a digital image in the collection that indicates the presence of the attribute, and outputting a quality score corresponding to the determined amount or percentage.