AI Sound Effect Prediction for Video Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current process of creating sound effects for video productions is time-consuming and labor-intensive, requiring human editors to manually select and synchronize audio clips with visual cues, which is inefficient and repetitive, especially in projects with tight timelines and limited budgets.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that uses trained models to automatically predict and generate sound effects by analyzing video frames and their associated metadata, allowing for the creation of a synchronized sound effect session that includes timing, type, and audio synthesis parameters, reducing the need for manual labor and increasing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual sound effect editing is used, then sound effects can be precisely synchronized with visual cues, but the process is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization precisionVSAvoidediting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual editing process with an automated machine learning system. The trained model analyzes video frames and automatically predicts sound effects, substituting human editorial work with computational analysis to achieve both precision and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing video content and generating sound effect predictions without requiring human intervention. The model independently processes video frames, identifies visual cues, and selects appropriate sound effects from a database

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual sound effect selection is used, then quality control can be maintained, but productivity is low and repetitive work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality controlVSAvoidediting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces repetitive manual selection with automated machine learning prediction. The system maintains quality control through sophisticated algorithms that analyze visual cues and predict appropriate sound effects, eliminating repetitive manual work while maintaining editorial standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of the manual editorial process by training models on existing sound effect databases. The trained model replicates the decision-making process of experienced editors, predicting sound effects based on learned patterns from video content

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated sound effect prediction is used, then productivity increases and time is reduced, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex sound effect prediction task into manageable components: video frame analysis, visual cue identification, sound effect database querying, and automated selection. This segmentation allows the system to handle complexity through modular processing stages rather than a monolithic complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The trained machine learning model acts as an intermediary between video analysis and sound effect selection. This intermediary component simplifies the overall system architecture by providing a dedicated prediction layer that bridges visual input and audio output without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual editing is used for tight timelines, then creative control is maintained, but the process becomes inefficient and repetitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreative controlVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service automation that handles routine sound effect selection and synchronization, freeing creative resources for higher-value tasks. The automated system maintains adaptability by processing diverse video content through learned patterns while improving workflow efficiency through elimination of repetitive manual operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11748406B2AI-assisted sound effect editorial
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD
  • US11748406B2 patent drawing
  • US11748406B2 patent drawing
  • US11748406B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some implementations of the disclosure relate to a method, comprising: obtaining, at a computing device, first video clip data including multiple sequential video frames, the multiple sequential video frames including at least a first video frame and a second video frame that occurs after the first video frame; inputting, at the computing device, the first video clip data into at least one trained model that automatically predicts, based on at least features of the first video frame and features of the second video frame, sound effect data corresponding to the second video frame; and determining, at the computing device, based on the sound effect data predicted for the second video frame, a first sound effect file corresponding to the second video frame.