AI Space Launch Platform for Adaptive Launch Window Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional space launch operations face challenges with tightly controlled launch windows, leading to delays and increased risks due to misalignment with orbital mechanics, weather conditions, and regulatory constraints, necessitating improved systems for dynamic decision-making and safer, more efficient spacelift solutions.

Innovation Solution

A space launch service platform (SLSP) utilizing artificial intelligence and data analytics to integrate diverse data sources, normalize constraint data, generate a constraint graph, compute confidence scores for launch windows, and adjust operational parameters to optimize launch timing and compliance with safety and regulatory requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pre-set launch windows with limited airspace access are used to ensure public safety and regulatory compliance, then safety and regulatory compliance are improved, but launch efficiency and alignment with orbital mechanics deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepublic safety and regulatory complianceVSAvoidlaunch efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts launch windows based on real-time constraint data from multiple sources including weather monitoring, airspace tracking, and orbital debris catalogs. Instead of fixed pre-set windows, the system continuously evaluates constraint overlap metrics and generates optimized launch opportunities that adapt to changing conditions while maintaining safety requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of launch windows by computing confidence scores based on statistical analysis of historical outcomes and real-time data. Launch windows are selected based on confidence scores that reflect satisfaction of safety, resource availability, and regulatory compliance criteria, allowing flexible parameter adjustment rather than rigid pre-set timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If secondary launch times are chosen within approved launch windows, then regulatory compliance is maintained, but scheduling risks and misinformation risks to air traffic and marine traffic increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidscheduling risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by monitoring real-time constraint data from airspace and maritime tracking systems. When a secondary launch time is selected, the system re-evaluates all constraints and provides updated confidence scores, ensuring that scheduling decisions are informed by current conditions and reduce misinformation risks to traffic operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of potential secondary launch times by computing constraint overlap metrics and confidence scores before final selection. This advance evaluation identifies scheduling risks early and allows operators to choose secondary times that minimize impacts on air and maritime traffic while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If extensive data sets from diverse sources are integrated to enhance mission assurance, then reliability and public safety are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission assuranceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments extensive data sets from diverse sources into distinct constraint categories including terrestrial constraints, atmospheric constraints, orbital constraints, and operational constraints. Each category is processed separately through normalization and standardization operations, then integrated through constraint graph analysis, reducing the complexity of handling all data simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces constraint graphs as an intermediary structure that mediates between extensive raw data from diverse sources and final launch window decisions. The graphs represent individual constraints as nodes and interdependencies as edges, providing a structured intermediate representation that simplifies the integration and analysis of complex multi-source data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250256864A1Methods and Systems for Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Space Launch Operations
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 LAUNCH ON DEMAND CORP
  • US20250256864A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256864A1 patent drawing
  • US20250256864A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing a space launch service platform (SLSP) that integrates artificial intelligence and data analytics to support launch operations. The SLSP may connect to multiple data sources, collect data, and standardize the collected data according to regulatory and operational standards. The SLSP may evaluate launch safety and risks using standardized data and generate a situational analysis for decision-making. The SLSP may provide graphical overlays and decision-support tools to highlight optimal launch windows and potential risks.