AI Model Split Point Selection Under Bandwidth and Power Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of determining an optimal split point for an artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) model to improve execution efficiency is unresolved, particularly due to limited computing power, memory, and high power consumption in terminal devices, and excessive bandwidth usage when offloading to edge servers.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine a split point based on network state information, power consumption, and AI model attributes, ensuring the split point meets performance indicators such as transmission rate, channel state, and power consumption, allowing parts of the model to be executed on the terminal device and server efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the AI/ML model is offloaded to an edge server to enable processing, then the terminal device's computing power limitation is resolved, but excessively high uplink transmission bandwidth is occupied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing capabilityVSAvoiduplink transmission bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the AI/ML model into multiple parts and distributes them across different computing nodes (terminal device and edge server). This segmentation allows the system to balance computing requirements with bandwidth constraints by executing some model layers locally and others remotely, rather than offloading the entire model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables different parts of the system to have different functional qualities - the terminal device executes parts of the model locally using its available computing resources, while the edge server handles other parts. This local quality approach optimizes resource utilization by matching computational tasks to appropriate execution locations based on local capabilities and constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If the AI/ML model is executed locally on the terminal device, then uplink transmission bandwidth is saved, but the terminal device cannot support real-time computing due to limited computing power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuplink transmission bandwidthVSAvoidreal-time computing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the AI/ML model into multiple executable parts distributed between terminal device and edge server. This segmentation enables the system to achieve real-time computing by parallel execution of model parts across multiple nodes, compensating for the terminal device's limited local computing power while reducing bandwidth requirements compared to full offloading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the computing capabilities of the terminal device and edge server into a unified distributed computing system. By combining local execution with remote processing, the system achieves real-time computing performance that neither component could provide alone, while optimizing bandwidth utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If the AI/ML model is split into multiple parts for distributed execution, then resource utilization is improved, but the complexity of determining optimal split points increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidsplit point determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system evaluates the performance and resource consumption at different split points, then uses this information to determine optimal segmentation. The feedback loop allows the system to adaptively identify split points that maximize execution efficiency while minimizing complexity, based on actual runtime measurements and resource availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters such as model partitioning granularity, execution location, and data transmission frequency to optimize the balance between execution efficiency and system complexity. By dynamically adjusting these parameters based on network conditions, device capabilities, and task requirements, the system achieves high productivity without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260023423A1Method and apparatus for determining split point
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20260023423A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023423A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023423A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and an apparatus for determining a split point are disclosed. The method includes: obtaining network state information, first power consumption information of a terminal device, and artificial intelligence model attribute information; and determining at least one split point from a plurality of split points based on the network state information, the first power consumption information, and the artificial intelligence model attribute information. According to the foregoing method, a split point is determined based on the network state information, the first power consumption information, the artificial intelligence model attribute information, or other information, so that the determined at least one split point can meet performance indicators such as a transmission rate, channel state information, and power consumption.