AI System Orchestration for LLM Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large language models (LLMs) are opaque, imprecise, and inconsistent, making them challenging to debug and integrate consistently into systems, especially due to complex interactions involving multiple back-and-forth responses that complicate consistency and predictability.

Innovation Solution

An Artificial Intelligence System (AIS) is configured to activate LLMs and other AI processes via natural language prompts, using an orchestration system that selects and executes appropriate data services, including plugins, to improve user interactions by managing user inputs, processing data, and presenting updates through interactive interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If LLMs are used for conversational interactions, then user engagement and natural language processing capability are improved, but consistency and predictability of responses deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural language processing capabilityVSAvoidconsistency and predictability of responses
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer between the user and the LLM that includes prompt management, response validation, and contextual control mechanisms. This intermediary structure allows the system to maintain the natural language processing benefits while adding layers of control to improve response consistency and predictability through structured prompt templates and response filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If complex calls to LLM involve multiple back-and-forth responses, then task completion capability is improved, but debugging difficulty and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex multi-turn interaction into discrete, manageable components including individual prompt templates, response validation rules, and contextual state management units. Each segment can be independently tested, validated, and debugged, reducing the overall system complexity while maintaining the capability to complete complex tasks through coordinated execution of these segmented components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If LLM responses are made more precise and consistent, then reliability is improved, but flexibility and conversational capability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of responsesVSAvoidconversational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic prompt templates and contextual parameters that allow the system to adjust between precision and flexibility based on the specific interaction context. The system can dynamically select between structured templates for consistency and more open-ended prompts for flexibility, with the ability to transition between these modes based on task requirements and conversational state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240338232A1Artificial intelligence system user interfaces
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20240338232A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338232A1 patent drawing
  • US20240338232A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data orchestration system can be used to respond to natural language prompts (e.g., user submitted prompts) where the response involves a data processing workflow being executed using one or more data processing services (e.g., microservices of a data processing platform or software). This can provide for execution of data processing workflows (e.g., complex workflows) without a user needing to specify the particular data processing services that are included in the data processing workflows. This can cause new functionality to be available to a user (e.g., to a user who lacks the technical skillset to specify the relevant data processing services without use of the systems and methods disclosed herein), and/or can dramatically reduce the time required to orchestrate the data processing services that are included in the data processing workflows.