AI Task Routing for Condition-Specific Meeting Records

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video conferencing-based services struggle to accurately identify user intentions and provide meeting records that conform to specific user conditions, such as summaries for specific speakers or output in a set tone, often resulting in inaccurate results.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing an artificial intelligence model to determine user tasks, such as summarization, question answering, or translation, by splitting meeting materials into units, performing tasks in parallel, and merging results to meet user requirements, including specific-speaker, action item, and condition-based summarization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If artificial intelligence models are used to generate meeting records with specific conditions (e.g., summaries for specific speakers, specific tones), then service customization and accuracy should improve, but in typical services users do not often receive accurate results according to the conditions they requested

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of meeting record generationVSAvoidreliability of condition compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the meeting record generation process into multiple independent modules: a task determination device that identifies user intentions, a summarization task device that processes specific conditions, and a post-task device that refines output. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in specific conditions, improving overall accuracy and reliability of condition compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the task determination device continuously monitors user inputs and adjusts task assignments accordingly. When users specify conditions like specific speakers or tones, the system receives feedback about these requirements and modifies the summarization process to ensure accurate compliance, thereby improving both measurement precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple types of summarization tasks are performed to meet diverse user requirements (specific speaker, action item, condition-based), then service versatility improves, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveversatility of meeting record servicesVSAvoidprocessing time for multiple tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-defining multiple types of summarization tasks (specific speaker summarization, action item summarization, condition-based summarization) and their corresponding processing logic before user requests arrive. When users make diverse requirements, the system can quickly match and execute pre-configured task types without time-consuming on-the-fly decisions, thus maintaining versatility while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively executing only the necessary summarization tasks based on user requirements. Instead of always performing all possible summarization types, the system determines which specific tasks are needed (e.g., only specific speaker summarization when that condition is requested) and executes only those, thereby reducing unnecessary processing time while maintaining full versatility when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If meeting materials are split into units for processing, then processing efficiency and model compatibility improve, but the complexity of coordinating multiple unit tasks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiency of meeting recordsVSAvoidcomplexity of task coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments meeting materials into units to improve processing efficiency and model compatibility. Each unit can be processed independently by the summarization task device, allowing parallel processing and better alignment with model capabilities. The segmentation is managed through a coordinated framework that tracks units through the summarization pipeline, reducing overall processing time while maintaining manageable coordination complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4629149A1Method, apparatus, system, and computer program for providing meeting record services
Publication Date: 2025.10.08 SAMSUNG SDS CO LTD
  • EP4629149A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4629149A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4629149A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method, apparatus, system, and non-transitory computer program for providing a meeting record service is provided. The method includes determining a first task that a user wishes to perform from among multiple types of predetermined tasks, based on a user input, by implementing an artificial intelligence model in a task determination device, performing the determined first task, based on the meeting record, by implementing the artificial intelligence model in a first task device corresponding to the first task, and providing a result of performing the determined first task to the user.