AI-Based Ticket Routing System for Dynamic Endpoint Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication routing systems fail to dynamically and efficiently route issue messages, such as tracking tickets, to the most appropriate endpoint, often relying on static mappings that do not account for variations in communication topics, agent availability, and channel types, leading to suboptimal response times and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to analyze messages, identify user intents, determine similar issues, and automatically route communications to the most suitable terminal device based on agent expertise, availability, and channel capabilities, enabling dynamic and real-time routing decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static mapping methods are used for routing communications, then system complexity is reduced, but routing accuracy and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting system complexityVSAvoidrouting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic routing by using machine learning models that continuously learn from communication patterns and adapt routing decisions in real-time. The system transitions from static pre-defined routing rules to dynamic adaptive routing that responds to changing conditions such as agent availability, communication topic trends, and channel capabilities, thereby improving routing accuracy without requiring proportional increases in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intelligent routing intermediary layer that sits between the communication endpoint and the agent. This intermediary uses trained machine learning models to analyze communication content, determine user intent, and select optimal routing targets. The intermediary handles the complexity of adaptive routing algorithms while presenting a simplified interface to both users and agents, effectively decoupling routing intelligence from system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic AI-based routing is implemented, then routing accuracy and adaptability improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting adaptabilityVSAvoidrouting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models offline using historical communication data before deploying them to the routing system. The models are trained in advance to recognize communication patterns, user intents, and optimal routing decisions. This pre-training phase separates the complex learning process from the real-time routing operation, allowing the system to achieve high adaptability during runtime without the complexity of real-time model training and retraining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by deploying replicated instances of trained machine learning models across the routing infrastructure. Instead of implementing a single complex centralized routing brain, the system creates multiple copies of the routing intelligence that can independently make decisions. This distribution of routing logic through model copies improves adaptability across different communication channels while managing system complexity through modular replication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If manual routing methods are used, then system resource consumption is reduced, but response time and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication response timeVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the routing system to automatically analyze communication content, determine user intent, and select routing targets without human intervention. The machine learning models process communications autonomously, extracting relevant features and making routing decisions based on learned patterns. This self-service capability eliminates manual routing overhead and significantly improves response time, while the efficient algorithms keep resource consumption manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical routing processes with automated electronic machine learning-based routing. Instead of human operators manually analyzing communications and making routing decisions (a slow, resource-intensive process), the system uses trained ML models that process communications electronically at high speed. This substitution dramatically improves productivity and response time while the automated nature of ML inference actually reduces operational resource consumption compared to manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12058014B2Systems and methods for external system integration
Publication Date: 2024.08.06 LIVEPERSON INC
  • US12058014B2 patent drawing
  • US12058014B2 patent drawing
  • US12058014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates generally to facilitating routing of communications across external systems. More specifically, techniques are provided to dynamically route issue tracking tickets to disparate endpoints based on the content of the ticket.