AI Traffic Flow Prediction and Adaptive Signal Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current traffic management systems struggle to accurately predict traffic flow and optimize traffic light control across large regions due to reliance on fixed schedules, limited data accuracy, and inability to adapt to dynamic changes in traffic conditions, leading to congestion and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses sensors to track individual vehicles and learn their routes, predicting future traffic patterns based on historical data and real-time information, including weather and events, to adjust traffic signal timings proactively and optimize traffic flow across a network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fixed timed schedules are used for traffic light control, then system simplicity is maintained, but traffic flow adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidtraffic flow adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic traffic light control by transitioning from fixed timed schedules to adaptive timing that responds to real-time vehicle detection data. The system continuously adjusts green split and cycle length based on detected traffic conditions, making the control parameters dynamic rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by using vehicle detection sensors to monitor actual traffic conditions and feeding this information back to the traffic light controller. This closed-loop control enables the system to adjust timing parameters based on real-world performance and traffic demand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If vehicle detection systems are installed at traffic signals, then traffic flow information accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow information accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs detection cameras that serve multiple functions: detecting vehicle presence, counting vehicles, measuring queue length, and providing live monitoring imagery. This multi-functional approach improves measurement precision while avoiding the need for separate specialized sensors for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses image copying technology where cameras capture visual copies of traffic scenes and process these digital images to extract traffic information. This optical copying approach replaces complex physical sensors with simpler optical devices and image processing algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If centralized control systems are implemented across large regions, then coordinated traffic management is improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregional coordination capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large regional network into smaller controllable units or zones, each with its own detection and control capabilities. This segmentation allows centralized coordination while managing complexity through modular organization of control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional two-dimensional traffic light control to multi-dimensional coordination by integrating spatial distribution of multiple traffic lights with temporal scheduling. The centralized system optimizes across multiple dimensions simultaneously, coordinating timing and sequencing across the regional network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Device complexity

If off-line optimization approaches are used to generate timing schedules, then computational simplicity is maintained, but responsiveness to unpredictable traffic changes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational approach simplicityVSAvoidtraffic flow responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary offline optimization to establish baseline timing schedules and parameter ranges, then uses real-time detection data to make rapid adjustments within these pre-calculated boundaries. This hybrid approach combines the simplicity of offline planning with the responsiveness of real-time adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of timing parameters by transitioning from static offline-optimized schedules to real-time adaptive control. The system continuously modifies green split, cycle length, and phase timing based on current traffic conditions while maintaining computational efficiency through constrained optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4060642B1Method and system of predictive traffic flow and of traffic light control
Publication Date: 2024.08.07 XAN LABS INT LTD
  • EP4060642B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4060642B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4060642B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A traffic management system for controlling traffic flow in an area is provided. The system has sensors (10) positioned at respective junctions (2) in the area, forming a network of nodes (2). Software (25) processes the sensor signals to derive vehicle signatures indicative of a particular vehicle detected at the node at a particular time. This is used to track the progress of vehicles traveling across the network and derive vehicle statistics (60) as to traffic volumes (64), routes (66) and journey times (62) at various times. Artificial intelligence (Al) (80) trained on historical vehicle statistics arranged to predict traffic arriving at plural junctions at a future time based on receiving a current count of vehicles sensed at nodes in the network. Based on the prediction, a control plan for traffic lights (3) is determined to optimise traffic flow.