Domain-Specific AI Training Data Curation for Hallucination Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing generative AI models often hallucinate and produce incorrect responses to domain-specific questions, suffer from data cutoff issues, and require heavy preprocessing of unstructured textual data, while lacking a systematic approach for acquiring domain-specific data for fine-tuning.

Innovation Solution

A method involving expert identification of seed documents, keyword extraction, targeted web scraping, content validation using generative AI, and iterative refinement to create a domain-specific dataset for training, ensuring data relevance and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If general purpose generative AI models are used, then they are highly capable in various natural language tasks, but they hallucinate and produce incorrect output responses to domain-specific questions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability in natural language tasksVSAvoidaccuracy in domain-specific questions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training data into domain-specific portions by crawling and collecting data from domain-relevant websites identified through expert input. This segmentation allows the model to specialize in specific domains while maintaining general capabilities, resolving the contradiction between versatility and domain accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of training data composition by incorporating a significant portion of domain-specific crawled data alongside general-purpose data. This parameter adjustment enables the model to achieve both general capability and domain-specific accuracy by modifying the data mixture ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If unstructured textual data is collected from the web, then large amounts of data are available, but the data is noisy and requires heavy pre-processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of training dataVSAvoidpre-processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing structured crawling with predefined schemas and validation rules before the main training data collection. This preliminary structuring reduces noise and organizes data in advance, significantly reducing the pre-processing complexity required for the bulk data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through validation rules and quality checks during the crawling process. Data that does not meet predefined quality criteria is filtered out or flagged for revision, creating a feedback loop that continuously improves data quality and reduces downstream pre-processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If existing web crawling approaches are used, then systematic collection from webpages is possible, but they do not focus on obtaining domain-specific data based on expert input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystematic data collection efficiencyVSAvoiddomain-specific relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces domain experts as intermediaries between the crawling system and the data sources. Experts provide input on which websites and content types are relevant to specific domains, enabling the systematic crawler to efficiently collect domain-specific data while maintaining high productivity through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of information

If LLMs process lengthy documents, then comprehensive information can be analyzed, but the context limits of finite tokens are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive information analysisVSAvoidcontext window limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments lengthy documents into smaller chunks during the crawling and processing stage, organizing them into structured formats that can be processed within token limits while preserving comprehensive information through systematic segmentation and indexing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260079898A1Systems and methods for producing domain-specific data for ai model training
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 HITACHI LTD
  • US20260079898A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079898A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079898A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for producing domain-specific data for training generative AI models as described herein systematically acquire, validate, and fine-tune AI models using domain-specific data. In embodiments, this comprises identifying seed documents, extracting keywords, performing refined searches, and scraping relevant content. The data is then pre-processed, chunked, and indexed. Using a retrieval-augmented generation approach, the system evaluates the quality and relevance of the data, ensuring efficient computational resource use and improved model training outcomes. By leveraging expert knowledge and systematic data validation, the accuracy and reliability of domain-specific AI models is enhanced.