AI-Driven Transaction Classification System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for categorizing business transactions for tax analysis rely heavily on rules-based processing, which can become inaccurate over time due to lack of adaptability to changing tax laws and company structures, and are limited by pre-defined categorizations.

Innovation Solution

The use of an AI model trained on transactional data, which can adapt to changes in tax laws and company structures, and can automatically recognize updates in tax laws by performing internet searches, to categorize transactions accurately.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If rules-based processing is used for transaction categorization, then the system is simple to implement and operate, but the accuracy deteriorates over time due to lack of adaptability to changing tax laws and company structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a hybrid classification system that dynamically combines rules-based processing with machine learning models. The system adapts its classification approach based on the specific transaction type and context, allowing it to maintain simplicity for straightforward cases while achieving high accuracy for complex or changing scenarios through adaptive AI intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary between the rules-based system and the final classification output. This intermediary layer processes transactions that are ambiguous or don't fit predefined rules, thereby maintaining the simplicity of rules-based operation while improving overall classification accuracy through intelligent intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If pre-defined categorizations are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to changing tax laws and company structures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains a static rules-based framework for simplicity but introduces dynamic machine learning models that continuously adapt to changing tax laws and company structures. This allows the system to keep low complexity in its core architecture while gaining adaptability through the adaptive AI component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the classification system by introducing machine learning models that can automatically adjust classification parameters based on learned patterns from historical data and changing regulations, thereby maintaining simple pre-defined categorizations while achieving adaptability through parameter optimization by AI.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual classification is used, then the accuracy is high, but the productivity and analysis time for large datasets deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidanalysis speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the classification process into two parts: automated machine learning classification for the majority of transactions to maintain high productivity, and manual review only for edge cases or low-confidence classifications. This segmentation preserves high accuracy through selective manual intervention while maintaining fast processing for bulk data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model performs self-service classification for the majority of transactions without human intervention, achieving high productivity. The system only escalates to manual classification when the AI model's confidence is below a threshold, thereby maintaining accuracy through targeted human review while preserving automated processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of manufacture

If rules-based processing is used, then the system is easy to implement, but the reliability deteriorates due to inability to adapt to changing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a machine learning intermediary that sits between the simple rules-based system and the classification output. This intermediary maintains the ease of implementation of rules-based processing while improving reliability by handling edge cases and adapting to changing conditions through learned patterns from historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains fixed rules for ease of implementation but allows the machine learning component to dynamically change classification parameters based on learned patterns and changing tax laws, thereby preserving implementation simplicity while achieving reliability through adaptive parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250045303A1Intelligent Transaction Analytics
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 KPMG INTERNATIONAL SERVICES LTD
  • US20250045303A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045303A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045303A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods disclosed herein provide for classification of business transactions. A client device runs an application that receives identification of a dataset for use in a classification analysis, where the dataset including a plurality of transactions. The application then receives user inputs to create a new analysis and runs a classification analysis of the transactions using one or more of manual classification, rules-based classification, and a machine learning model.