Trusted Execution Environment for AI Transaction Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The integration of AI systems introduces new information assurance risks due to the potential for inconsistent responses and the lack of trustworthiness in AI transactions, which can compromise user privacy and security.

Innovation Solution

A computational system and method that verifies the integrity and trustworthiness of AI transactions by using digitally signed requests and responses, leveraging blockchain, trusted computing technologies, and secure execution environments to ensure that AI systems operate as intended and produce verifiable results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If AI systems are integrated into computational processes, then productivity and transformational capability are improved, but information assurance vulnerability and trustworthiness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransformative capabilityVSAvoidinformation assurance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) as an intermediary layer between the AI system and the external environment. This TEE acts as a mediator that verifies the AI system's identity, measures its computational state, and ensures that requests are processed by the intended AI instance. The TEE creates a trusted boundary that allows AI integration while maintaining information assurance through cryptographic verification and attestation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If AI systems operate autonomously, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement and verification difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operationVSAvoidverification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the Trusted Execution Environment continuously measures and attests the AI system's computational state, then provides verification information back to the requestor. This feedback loop includes cryptographic attestation of the AI's identity, measurement of the computational environment, and verification that the response originated from the intended AI instance. This automated feedback enables autonomous operation while maintaining verifiability through structured trust evidence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If digital assurance mechanisms are implemented, then trustworthiness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetrustworthinessVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the trust verification functionality into a separate Trusted Execution Environment that is distinct from the main AI system. This extraction allows the complex cryptographic and measurement mechanisms to be isolated in a dedicated security subsystem, while the main AI system can operate with standard interfaces. The TEE handles the complexity of digital assurance through separate attestation and verification processes, reducing the burden on the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250112783A1System to Assure a Response from an Identified, Measured and Verified AI
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 SPROQUET CORP
  • US20250112783A1 patent drawing
  • US20250112783A1 patent drawing
  • US20250112783A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An AI verification system using existing capabilities provided by trusted computing and blockchain technology. The AI verification system can be optimized to assure that input from a client system sent to an AI system to make a request is not tampered with in creation or transmission. The response from the AI system is processed by the AI verification system to ensure that it is secure for delivery and presentation back to the client including the cyber assurance data collected from the operating environment of the AI system. The AI verification system can produce sufficient forensic data to assure a response from AI systems and services is trusted and verified. The AI verification system may be encapsulated in and implemented as an AI verification embedded microcontroller.