AI Patch-Based Video Noise Estimation for Adaptive DNR

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital video display systems face challenges in automatically adjusting the level of noise reduction in high-definition video signals due to computational limitations and inconsistencies in AI-based denoising techniques, leading to video artifacting and suboptimal image quality.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an AI-based noise metric using patch sampling and denoising techniques, such as diffusion models, to estimate noise levels in real-time and adjust the digital noise reduction (DNR) application level dynamically, leveraging GPU or NPU modules for efficient processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If AI-based denoising is applied to estimate noise levels, then noise reduction accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise level estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the video frame into multiple patches and processes only a subset of these patches for AI-based denoising to estimate noise levels. This segmentation approach allows the system to achieve accurate noise estimation without processing the entire frame, thereby reducing computational complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies AI-based denoising to only a partial set of patches rather than the entire frame. By using a representative sample of patches, the patent achieves sufficient noise level estimation accuracy without the excessive computational cost of processing all pixels, thus resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Manufacturing precision

If high DNR levels are applied to reduce noise, then image quality is improved, but video artifacting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidvideo artifacting
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the DNR application level based on real-time noise level estimates derived from patch sampling. Instead of applying a fixed high DNR level that causes artifacting, the system adapts the DNR strength to match the actual noise conditions, thereby improving image quality while minimizing harmful artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses AI-based denoising of sampled patches to create a feedback loop that estimates noise levels and adjusts DNR parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that DNR is applied at optimal levels tailored to the specific noise characteristics of each frame, preventing over-processing and associated artifacting while maintaining high image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time noise estimation is performed using patch sampling, then adaptability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent samples only a subset of patches from the video frame rather than processing the entire frame for noise estimation. This segmentation enables real-time adaptability by providing quick noise level estimates that can be used to adjust DNR parameters frame-by-frame, while significantly reducing the processing time required compared to full-frame analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs AI-based denoising on only a partial set of patches to estimate noise levels in real-time. This partial action approach provides sufficient adaptability to changing noise conditions without the time cost of processing the complete frame, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260051030A1Adjusting video noise reduction using an ai-based noise metric
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 ROKU INC
  • US20260051030A1 patent drawing
  • US20260051030A1 patent drawing
  • US20260051030A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are system, apparatus, article of manufacture, method and/or computer program product embodiments, and/or combinations and sub-combinations thereof, for automatically adjusting high-definition video noise reduction using an artificial-intelligence-based noise metric from patch sampling. An example embodiment operates by sampling contiguous-pixel portions of a frame of a digital video signal, denoising the sampled patches using artificial-intelligence-based denoising, computing an estimate of noise in the digital video signal based on a comparison of the denoised patches and their respective sampled patches, and denoising the digital video signal by applying an amount of digital noise reduction (DNR) to the digital video signal that is based on the computed noise estimate. The denoising of the digital video signal is thereby performed in real time as the video signal is displayed on a digital video display. The patches can be sampled from random spatial locations within the video frame.