AI Workflow System for Reducing Hallucinations via Stepwise Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current generative AI and large language models suffer from hallucinations, where outputs are fabricated and appear accurate, due to a lack of intrinsic understanding of 'correct' or 'incorrect' predictions.

Innovation Solution

A model-agnostic, interaction-design-oriented approach is implemented, which involves generating step-wise interactions with language models and tailoring user interfaces to display data management and user queries as workflow steps, optimizing outputs through feedback and prompt engineering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional AI models generate outputs directly without step-by-step workflows, then generation speed is maintained, but hallucination accuracy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput accuracyVSAvoidgeneration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the AI output generation process into multiple discrete steps (Step 1, Step 2, Step 3, etc.), where each step produces a partial output that is validated before proceeding to the next step. This segmentation allows the system to maintain higher accuracy by checking intermediate results while managing the time cost through efficient step execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by generating and validating intermediate outputs at each step before finalizing the complete output. This preliminary validation approach prevents hallucinations from propagating through the entire generation process, improving reliability while the structured workflow manages time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If step-by-step workflows are implemented to reduce hallucinations, then output accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput accuracyVSAvoidworkflow complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the generation process into standardized steps with clear input-output relationships, the patent manages complexity through modularity. Each step is a discrete unit that can be independently validated and controlled, making the overall complex workflow more manageable and less error-prone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms at each step where intermediate outputs are validated against expected criteria before proceeding. This feedback loop reduces the need for complex centralized control by enabling local validation decisions, thereby managing system complexity while maintaining high output accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If prompt engineering is used to improve model outputs, then accuracy improves, but development time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies prompt engineering techniques in advance to create optimized prompts for each step of the workflow. By performing this optimization work preliminarily during system setup rather than during runtime, the system achieves high prediction accuracy while minimizing the time cost during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes prompt parameters and configurations during the workflow design phase to improve prediction accuracy. By adjusting these parameters beforehand and establishing a structured step-by-step process, the patent reduces the need for extensive iterative prompt engineering during deployment, thereby balancing accuracy with development time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250117432A1Systems and methods for database management integrating ai workflows
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 TDAA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US20250117432A1 patent drawing
  • US20250117432A1 patent drawing
  • US20250117432A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are systems and methods for AI management configured to guide interactions between end users systems and generative AI services. Various examples can manage data operations, among other options. In various embodiments, an AI management system is configured to host an interactive session via generating workflow steps for controlling interaction with AI models. The interactive session is configured to identify data management operations on user specified data sources. The AI management system can be used to analyze the data sources specified to generate a canonical data format spanning the multiple data sources, generate code for mapping the data sources into a canonical format, normalize the resulting data, cleanse the resulting data, validate the resulting data, and automatically generate code for each such function that can then be triggered by users interacting with the user interface.