AI Workplace Risk Profiling Using Wearables and IoT Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing workplace safety systems fail to collect comprehensive information on work activities and interactions between workers and environments, relying on subjective worker reports and wearable sensors that are limited by privacy concerns and worker reluctance, leading to high accident rates and costs.

Innovation Solution

A predictive system using wearable devices and IoT sensors to detect vital signs and environmental parameters, combined with AI and Machine Learning models, to create real-time risk profiles and provide decision support for improving safety through risk mitigation strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If wearable sensors are used to detect worker vital signs and environmental parameters, then measurement precision and data collection capability are improved, but device complexity and privacy concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the safety monitoring function into multiple independent components: wearable devices worn by workers, fixed sensors deployed in the environment, and a central processing server. Each component performs a specific function (vital sign detection, environmental parameter measurement, data aggregation and risk calculation), allowing the system to achieve high measurement precision through specialized sensors while managing complexity through modular architecture where each segment can be independently configured and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If comprehensive data collection from workers and environment is implemented, then reliability of safety assessment is improved, but loss of information and privacy issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assessment reliabilityVSAvoidprivacy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential safety-critical data elements needed for risk assessment from the vast amount of potentially collectible information. Instead of collecting all possible worker data, the system specifically targets vital signs (heart rate, temperature), environmental parameters (gas concentrations, temperature, humidity), and task information. This extraction approach ensures comprehensive safety assessment reliability by focusing on proven risk indicators while minimizing privacy intrusion by excluding unnecessary personal information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where collected data is immediately processed to update risk profiles, which then feed back into real-time alerts and notifications to workers and supervisors. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that the safety assessment remains dynamically reliable by continuously incorporating new data while processing only what is necessary for current risk evaluation, avoiding accumulation of excess personal information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If real-time risk profiling and AI analysis are implemented, then productivity of safety management is improved, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety management efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring risk calculation models with predetermined weightings and thresholds for different risk factors based on historical data and safety regulations. Machine learning models are trained in advance on historical incident data to establish baseline risk patterns. This preliminary preparation enables the system to process real-time data efficiently using pre-computed algorithms, achieving high safety management productivity without requiring complex real-time computational operations, thus managing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If manual worker reporting of risks is used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision and objectivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereporting simplicityVSAvoidrisk assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges automated sensor-based detection with optional manual worker reporting into a unified data collection framework. Wearable devices and environmental sensors automatically collect objective vital sign and environmental data, while workers can supplement this with subjective observations through simple mobile app inputs. The system combines both data streams, weighting automated measurements higher for objective parameters while allowing manual input for contextual factors, thereby maintaining ease of operation through simple interfaces while improving measurement precision through multiple independent verification sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12548433B2Predictive system and method for safety in the workplace
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 ADAM AI SOLUTIONS SRL
  • US12548433B2 patent drawing
  • US12548433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A predictive system and method for the safety of subjects in a workplace. The system may include wearable devices, each being configured to detect and transmit an identification code and physical magnitudes representative of vital values, IoT sensors, positioned within the work environment to be monitored and configured to transmit an identification code and first parameters characteristic of the work environment, a knowledge base including occupational accident-type models that each include a set of data which contribute to a calculation of risk factors, and a computer unit configured to process occupational risk data that includes an input module configured to receive said identification code and said physical magnitudes and said identification code and first parameters characteristic of the work environment. The system further includes a risk calculation module configured to determine an accident risk profile of a subject based on an Artificial Intelligence model.