AIMSDS Data Security Attribution via ML Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Financial institutions face challenges in managing and securing data collected from global sources, as they must adhere to diverse and complex data privacy laws across different countries, which requires efficient data classification, tagging, and access control.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an Augmented Intelligent Machine for Systematic Attribution of Data Security (AIMSDS) that utilizes machine learning for real-time data classification and tagging, dynamically adapting to global regulations and user access controls, while ensuring proper data classification and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used for data classification and tagging, then implementation is straightforward, but productivity is low and cannot handle real-time requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata classification speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical classification processes with an automated machine learning system that uses natural language processing and classification algorithms to automatically tag and classify data elements, achieving real-time processing without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automation where the data classification and tagging is performed automatically by the machine learning model without requiring manual configuration or intervention, with the system learning and adapting to new data patterns autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If hardcoded rules are used for data classification, then the system is simple to implement, but adaptability to new regulations is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic system where the machine learning model continuously learns from new data and regulations, automatically updating its classification rules and tags to adapt to changing regulatory requirements without requiring system reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where classification results and regulatory changes are fed back into the machine learning model, enabling continuous improvement and adaptation of classification accuracy and regulatory compliance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If data is stored without classification, then storage is simple, but security and access control are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary classification and tagging to data elements at the time of ingestion, before storage or access operations occur, enabling subsequent security and access control measures to be efficiently applied based on pre-determined data sensitivity and regulatory requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If access control is based on user request without systematic classification, then access is easy to implement, but compliance with data privacy laws is difficult to ensure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control easeVSAvoidcompliance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary classification and tagging layer between data storage and user access requests, where the system automatically determines appropriate access permissions based on data classification tags and user credentials, ensuring compliance without complicating the access process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12242637B2Augmented intelligent machine for systematic attribution of data security
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES CO INC
  • US12242637B2 patent drawing
  • US12242637B2 patent drawing
  • US12242637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for augmented intelligent machine for systematic attribution of data security. A set of global regulations is received by the system. Next, at least one decision rule for mapping one or more data elements is output based at least in part on the set of dynamic global regulations. A data input is received from at least one data source. Next, the data input is parsed to determine at least one sensitive data elements. Then, a confidentiality level of at least one sensitive data element is determined. The ingesting table is joined with a drive mapping data set. Finally, at least one security policy is applied to a type of data input based at least in part on the drive mapping data set or the confidentiality level.