Air-Blow PIN Authentication via Microphone Speed Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current authentication methods, such as keyboard-based PIN entry and voice-based systems, are vulnerable to unauthorized access, and biometric techniques require complex and costly hardware, necessitating a secure and user-friendly alternative for PIN entry.

Innovation Solution

An air-blow based authentication method using a microphone to detect varying air blow speeds, where users enter PINs by moving a pointer on a dynamic user interface with randomly positioned numeric characters, utilizing a color band and blow speed to securely authenticate without visible keyboard strokes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If keyboard-based PIN entry is used, then ease of operation is improved, but security is worsened due to visibility of keystrokes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of PIN entryVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical keyboard input system with an acoustic input system using a microphone to detect air blows. This substitution eliminates the visibility problem of keyboard strokes while maintaining ease of operation through simple blowing gestures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the input parameter from visual/ tactile keyboard pressing to acoustic air blow detection. By detecting parameters like blow speed, duration, and pattern, the system achieves both security (non-visible input) and ease of operation (simple blowing action).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If voice-based authentication is used, then keyboard visibility problem is resolved, but security is worsened due to mimickable sound patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekeyboard visibility vulnerabilityVSAvoidauthentication security
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by focusing on specific characteristics of the air blow (blow speed, duration, pattern) rather than general voice characteristics. This localized measurement approach makes authentication more reliable and harder to mimic compared to general voice recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes voice-based acoustic recognition with controlled air blow detection. This replacement maintains the non-visual advantage over keyboards while improving security by using harder-to-mimic controlled blowing patterns compared to natural speech.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If biometric identification techniques are used, then authentication security is improved, but device complexity and cost are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a simple, inexpensive microphone instead of complex biometric hardware like fingerprint sensors or iris scanners. This affordable component achieves adequate authentication security without the high cost and complexity of traditional biometric systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes complex mechanical biometric sensors with a simple acoustic microphone system. This replacement dramatically reduces device complexity and cost while maintaining authentication functionality through software-based pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If hidden keyboard entries are used, then security is improved by preventing visual tracking, but ease of operation is worsened due to difficulty in hiding PIN entry

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePIN tracking vulnerabilityVSAvoidPIN entry usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical keyboard system with an acoustic microphone system, fundamentally eliminating the visibility issue. Users can authenticate by blowing air without any visual tracking being possible, while maintaining ease of operation through simple gestures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses pneumatic input (air blowing) instead of mechanical keyboard pressing. This approach naturally prevents visual tracking of PIN entry while keeping the interaction simple and user-friendly through breath-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides enhanced security for PIN entry by utilizing unique air blow patterns that are difficult to mimic, offering a user-friendly and cost-effective solution that prevents unauthorized access.

Implementation Method 1

receiving, using at least one input device, one or more air-blows associated with one or more blow speeds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic detection: Sound

Data Source

PatentUS9794251B2Systems and methods for authenticating using air-blow by user
Publication Date: 2017.10.17 WIPRO LTD
  • US9794251B2 patent drawing
  • US9794251B2 patent drawing
  • US9794251B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure related generally to systems and methods for authenticating using air-blow by user. At least one input device receives one or more air-blows associated with one or more blow speeds. A pointer on a user interface is caused to move to at least one numeric character on at least one scale in response to each of the one or more blow speeds. The at least one numeric character is compared with a predetermined personal identification number (PIN) mapped to the at least one user. The user is granted access or access is denied based on the comparing.