Air-Breathing Rocket Engine With Toroidal Combustion Chamber

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rocket engines require carrying both fuel and oxidizer into space, increasing weight and maintenance costs, while jet engines use ambient air as oxidizer, but both types rely on moving parts that can lead to catastrophic failures.

Innovation Solution

A rocket engine design with no moving parts that uses ambient fluid as reaction mass and oxidizer, if present, for combustion, featuring a single-piece construction with a funnel-shaped intake and toroidal combustion chamber to create a pressure differential for thrust generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rocket engines carry both fuel and oxidizer into space, then combustion can be sustained in the vacuum of space, but the weight and maintenance costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion sustainability in spaceVSAvoidweight of oxidizer
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the oxidizer from the carried propellants and obtains it from the ambient atmosphere during operation. The engine carries only fuel and takes oxygen from the air it intakes, eliminating the need to carry heavy oxidizer tanks into space while maintaining combustion capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The engine serves itself by using the ambient atmosphere as its oxidizer source. The intake system automatically draws in air, and the combustion chamber uses this ambient oxygen to burn the carried fuel, making the system self-sufficient for oxidizer without external supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Use of energy by moving object

If jet engines use moving parts such as impellers or compressors, then efficient combustion can be achieved, but manufacturing and maintenance costs increase and performance risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidperformance risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical compression system (impellers, compressors, turbines) with a pressure differential system. The combustion chamber creates a pressure difference that drives airflow through the intake and combustion processes without requiring moving mechanical parts, eliminating the associated maintenance and failure risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes all moving parts from the engine design, extracting the compression and airflow control functions from mechanical components and implementing them through pressure differential-driven fluid dynamics instead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If rocket engines use a closed manifold system for fuel and oxidizer delivery, then precise control can be achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropellant delivery controlVSAvoidmanifold system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex closed manifold system entirely and replaces it with a simplified open system where fuel is delivered directly to the combustion chamber and oxidizer is obtained from the ambient atmosphere through the intake, eliminating the need for complex distribution networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces the need for carrying oxidizer, lowers maintenance costs, and eliminates the risk of moving part failures, providing efficient thrust generation without the need for complex moving components.

Implementation Method 1

The combustion chamber is used to combust a mixture of fuel and oxidizer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

ejection of combustion products from the combustion chamber into the exhaust causes a pressure differential that causes ambient fluid to be drawn into the engine through the intake

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

Both types of engines produce thrust through an internal pressure difference, and both eject exhaust gases in a direction that is opposite to that of the path of travel of the engine

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust generation: Rocket

Data Source

PatentUS11635044B2Liquid-cooled air-breathing rocket engine
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 MOUNTAIN AEROSPACE RESEARCH SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11635044B2 patent drawing
  • US11635044B2 patent drawing
  • US11635044B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An air-breathing rocket engine in certain embodiments comprises an outer shell and an interior portion situated entirely within the front end of the outer shell. The interior portion includes a funnel-shaped intake and an annular primary combustion chamber between the inner front wall of the shell and the outer surface of the funnel-shaped intake. The intake has a central aperture that is in fluid communication with the throat and exhaust areas within the outer shell. A second circumferential gap is formed between the outer surface of the front inner wall and the inner surface of the front end of the outer shell and is in fluid communication with the throat and exhaust areas within the outer shell. One or more injector ports and one or more ignition ports are situated at the front end of the second circumferential gap.