Air Charge Estimation for Skip Fire Engine Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional air charge estimators in internal combustion engines are not well suited for skip fire controlled engines, as they fail to accurately predict cylinder air charge due to irregular and shifting firing sequences, leading to poor fuel injection and efficiency issues.

Innovation Solution

The development of methods and systems that estimate air charge by predicting manifold pressure based on current and anticipated firing sequences, actuator positions, and engine parameters, allowing for accurate fuel injection timing and improved air-fuel ratio regulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional air charge estimators are used in skip fire controlled engines, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision of cylinder air charge deteriorates due to irregular and shifting firing sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair charge estimator complexityVSAvoidcylinder air charge estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting future manifold pressure values and determining anticipated firing sequences before they occur. The controller predicts the firing sequence for a predetermined number of future engine cycles and uses this information to calculate anticipated manifold pressure values, which are then used to determine accurate air charge values for current and future combustion events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts to changing engine operating conditions by continuously updating predictions of firing sequences and manifold pressure values. The controller modifies air charge calculations based on predicted variations in engine speed, load, and firing patterns, allowing accurate measurements despite dynamic changes in engine operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If accurate air charge estimation is achieved through prediction methods, then the measurement precision improves, but the loss of time increases due to computational requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair charge estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time for fuel injection control
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations by predicting manifold pressure values and firing sequences in advance, before the actual combustion events occur. This allows the controller to prepare accurate air charge values ahead of time, reducing computational delays during critical fuel injection timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system calculates air charge values for a predetermined number of future engine cycles in advance, performing more calculations than immediately needed. This excessive action ensures that accurate air charge values are available when required, trading computational effort in advance for reduced real-time processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If skip fire engine control is implemented for finer displacement control, then the adaptability improves, but the reliability of conventional air charge estimation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine displacement control flexibilityVSAvoidair charge estimation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The controller determines anticipated firing sequences for future engine cycles in advance, before the skip fire pattern is executed. This preliminary determination allows the system to predict manifold pressure variations caused by irregular firing sequences, maintaining reliable air charge estimation despite the adaptability introduced by skip fire control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from predicted manifold pressure values and actual engine operation to continuously refine air charge calculations. By comparing predicted versus actual conditions and adjusting subsequent predictions, the system maintains reliable air charge estimation even as skip fire patterns change engine behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10253706B2Air charge estimation for use in engine control
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 TULA TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US10253706B2 patent drawing
  • US10253706B2 patent drawing
  • US10253706B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, devices, estimators, controllers and algorithms are described for estimating working chamber air charge during engine operations. The described approaches and devices are well suited for use in dynamic firing level modulation controlled engines. Manifold pressure is estimated for a time corresponding to an induction event associated with a selected working cycle. The manifold pressure estimate accounts for impacts from one or more intervening potential induction events that will occur between the time that the manifold pressure is estimated and the time that the induction event associated with the selected working cycle occurs. The estimated manifold pressure is used in the estimation of the air charge for the selected working cycle. The described approach may be used to individually calculate the air charge for each induction event at any time that the engine is operating in a mode that can benefit from the individual cylinder air charge estimations.