Air conditioning system, server system, network, method for controlling an air conditioning system and method for controlling a network

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air conditioning systems rely heavily on manual commissioning by expert installers, leading to inefficient operation and thermal discomfort due to variations in system dynamics over time, such as changes in emitter size, space use, or occupant activity, and often result in suboptimal performance compared to theoretical expectations.

Innovation Solution

An air conditioning system with a controller connected to a network for real-time data exchange, allowing for automated self-tuning of system control settings using aggregated network data and predictive models to optimize operational parameters like flow temperature and compressor frequency, adapting to changes in building dynamics without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual commissioning by expert installers is used, then initial system configuration can be completed, but system performance deteriorates over time due to changes in system dynamics and cannot adapt to changes automatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem adaptability to changesVSAvoidautomatic self-tuning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-tuning by automatically monitoring its own operational parameters and dynamically adjusting control settings without requiring manual intervention from experts. The controller continuously optimizes system performance based on real-time data from sensors and actuators, enabling the system to service and adapt itself autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor operational parameters (temperatures, pressures, flows) and feed this data back to the controller. The controller processes this feedback and dynamically adjusts actuator positions and operational settings to maintain optimal performance as system dynamics change over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If manual commissioning is performed, then system parameters can be configured initially, but operation efficiency decreases due to inability to detect and correct suboptimal performance over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation efficiencyVSAvoidtime for expert intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous optimization of operational parameters through ongoing monitoring and adjustment. Rather than relying on periodic manual interventions, the controller continuously adapts control settings to maintain peak efficiency, ensuring uninterrupted optimal performance as system conditions evolve

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual commissioning and adjustment with an automated electronic control system. Sensors, communication interfaces, and algorithms substitute for human experts, enabling automatic detection and correction of performance deviations without physical intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual commissioning checklists are used, then system configuration can be documented, but thermal discomfort occurs due to variations in installer expertise and inability to adapt to changing conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performance consistencyVSAvoidoccupant comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static initial configuration to dynamic continuous optimization. Control parameters are no longer fixed but continuously adjusted based on real-time monitoring of system performance and environmental conditions, enabling the system to adapt dynamically to changing occupancy patterns, weather conditions, and system degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of energy

If expert commissioning is performed, then initial performance can be optimized, but system sizing and balancing issues remain undetected leading to inefficient operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem performance monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements comprehensive feedback monitoring of operational parameters including temperatures, pressures, and flows throughout the system. This continuous data collection enables detection of inefficiencies such as improper system sizing, balancing issues, and component malfunctions by comparing actual performance against expected performance thresholds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary communication interface and data processing layer between sensors and the controller. This intermediary layer aggregates data from multiple sources, processes it through algorithms, and presents actionable insights for detecting and diagnosing system inefficiencies that would be difficult to identify through manual observation alone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3715738A1Air conditioning system, server system, network, method for controlling an air conditioning system and method for controlling a network
Publication Date: 2020.09.30 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • EP3715738A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3715738A1 patent drawing
  • EP3715738A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention refers to an air conditioning system, a server system, a network as well as a method for controlling an air conditioning system and a method for controlling a network.