Air Conditioning Set-Temperature Control for Comfort-Energy Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Air conditioning devices face a trade-off between energy-saving effects and user comfortability, as prioritizing energy savings often compromises comfort, and existing systems struggle to optimize set temperatures based on user behavior and space occupancy.

Innovation Solution

An air conditioning control device that acquires behavior information and set temperature history to calculate set-temperature duration times and features, determining comfortable and energy-efficient temperatures by learning user preferences and adjusting set points accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the set temperature is adjusted to prioritize energy-saving effects, then energy consumption is reduced, but user comfortability is deteriorated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoiduser comfortability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning of user temperature preferences during a learning period by collecting and analyzing historical temperature setting data. This preliminary action enables the system to determine optimal set temperatures in advance that balance energy savings with user comfort, rather than making adjustments reactively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring user temperature adjustments and occupancy patterns, then using this information to refine future temperature settings. The control device learns from past user behavior and adjusts set temperatures accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that improves energy efficiency while maintaining comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the set temperature is adjusted to prioritize user comfortability, then comfort is improved, but energy-saving effects are difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system determines optimal set temperatures in advance during the learning period by analyzing historical data, so that comfortable temperatures are established before the cooling or heating season begins. This preliminary determination allows the system to maintain user comfort while optimizing for energy savings from the start of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the set temperature parameter based on learned user preferences and occupancy patterns. Instead of using fixed high or low temperature settings, the control device adjusts the set temperature within an optimal range that balances comfort and energy efficiency, transforming a static parameter into a dynamic one

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If historical temperature data is used to calculate average preferred temperatures, then user comfort is maintained, but energy-saving opportunities are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser comfortVSAvoidenergy saving opportunity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of simply averaging historical temperatures, the system performs excessive analysis by calculating duration times for each temperature setting and determining temperature preferences based on occupancy periods. This partial focus on duration and timing rather than just average values reveals energy-saving opportunities that simple averaging would miss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static average temperature calculation to dynamic temperature preference determination that considers duration times and occupancy patterns. The optimal set temperature is determined based on when users are actually present and what temperatures they prefer during those periods, making the system adaptive rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If the learning period is extended to gather more temperature history data, then temperature preference accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature preference accuracyVSAvoidlearning period duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces simple data collection with intelligent data analysis by calculating duration times for each temperature setting and using this temporal information to determine preferences. This substitution of mechanical averaging with analytical processing based on duration and occupancy patterns achieves accurate temperature preference determination more efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary determination of temperature preferences during the learning period by analyzing duration times and occupancy patterns, rather than waiting for the learning period to end and then processing data. This preliminary analysis accelerates the determination process while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3070411B1Air conditioning control device, control method, and computer program
Publication Date: 2019.03.06 KK TOSHIBA
  • EP3070411B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3070411B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3070411B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3D

AI summary

According to one approach, an air conditioning control device includes: a measurement information acquirer, a duration time calculator, a feature calculator and a determiner. The measurement information acquirer acquires history information related to a set temperature of an air conditioning device. The duration time calculator calculates, for each of a plurality of set temperatures, a plurality of set-temperature duration times that are respective duration times of the set temperature based on the history information. The feature calculator calculates features related to respective duration times of the set temperatures based on the respective calculated set-temperature duration times. The determiner calculates respective evaluation values for the plurality of set temperatures based on the features and determines a set temperature to be instructed to the air conditioning device based on the evaluation values.