Air-Cooled Pressurizing Device with Segmented Airflow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pressurizing devices face challenges in efficiently cooling multiple heat-exchangers with varying sizes, shapes, and flow resistances, using a common airflow, which results in uneven cooling capacities and increased energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The pressurizing device incorporates a design where heat-exchangers are arranged near each other in the air channel, with guiding elements that split and direct the airflow to each heat-exchanger based on its specific cooling requirements, ensuring a more even distribution of airflow and improved cooling efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If multiple heat-exchangers are cooled by a common airflow, then device complexity is reduced, but cooling capacity becomes uneven across heat-exchangers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of airflow forcing devicesVSAvoidcooling capacity distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The air channel is segmented into multiple sub-channels using partition elements, with each sub-channel dedicated to cooling a specific heat-exchanger. This segmentation allows independent airflow control for each heat-exchanger while using a single airflow forcing device, thus maintaining low device complexity while achieving reliable and even cooling capacity distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The airflow channel is designed with varying cross-sectional areas and flow resistances in different regions to match the specific cooling requirements of each heat-exchanger. By adjusting local channel geometry and adding flow control elements, the airflow distribution is optimized for each heat-exchanger's size, shape, and thermal load characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If airflow is increased to meet cooling demands of all heat-exchangers, then cooling capacity is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidenergy consumption of airflow forcing device
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The air channel incorporates sections with different cross-sectional areas, flow resistances, and geometric configurations tailored to the specific cooling needs of each heat-exchanger. This local optimization ensures that each heat-exchanger receives the precise airflow quantity required, avoiding excessive energy consumption while maintaining adequate cooling capacity across all heat-exchangers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Adjustable flow control elements are incorporated into the air channel to dynamically regulate airflow distribution to each heat-exchanger based on real-time cooling demands. This allows the system to adapt airflow quantities optimally, reducing energy consumption when full cooling capacity is not required for all heat-exchangers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Volume of stationary object

If heat-exchangers are arranged close together, then device volume is reduced, but airflow distribution becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice volumeVSAvoidairflow channel design
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air channel is divided into multiple sub-channels using partition elements, with each sub-channel leading to a specific heat-exchanger. This segmentation enables compact arrangement of multiple heat-exchangers in close proximity while maintaining independent and controlled airflow paths, thus reducing device volume without compromising airflow distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The airflow channel utilizes three-dimensional routing and vertical stacking of heat-exchangers to achieve compact arrangement. By exploiting multiple spatial dimensions and creating complex but efficient flow paths, the design accommodates multiple heat-exchangers in close proximity while ensuring adequate airflow distribution to each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If different airflow quantities are supplied to each heat-exchanger, then cooling efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidairflow control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air channel is designed with varying cross-sectional areas, flow resistances, and geometric features in different sections to naturally direct appropriate airflow quantities to each heat-exchanger. This passive flow distribution approach achieves optimized cooling efficiency without requiring complex active control systems, multiple airflow forcing devices, or sophisticated regulation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The airflow distribution system utilizes the inherent pressure gradients and flow resistance characteristics of the channel geometry to automatically allocate appropriate airflow quantities to each heat-exchanger based on their cooling demands. This self-regulating mechanism achieves efficient cooling without external control intervention, maintaining simplicity while optimizing cooling performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for better adaptation of the airflow to the specific cooling needs of each heat-exchanger, enhancing cooling capacity, reducing energy consumption, and minimizing noise, while maintaining a compact and cost-effective design.

Implementation Method 1

two or more heat-exchangers positioned in the air channel for transferring heat from the heat-exchanger to air forced through the air channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS20250180037A1Air-cooled pressurizing device
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 ATLAS COPCO AIRPOWER NV
  • US20250180037A1 patent drawing
  • US20250180037A1 patent drawing
  • US20250180037A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An air-cooled pressurizing device wherein two or more heat-exchangers are arranged near or on top of one another or both in a cross-section of an air channel in such a way that a total air flow through the air channel is subdivided in several air streams. One or more guiding elements is or are provided in the air channel for splitting the air flow and guiding air to one or more of the heat-exchangers or a part of such heat-exchangers.