Air-Filled Shock Absorption Structure for Multi-Directional Collisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional shock absorption systems installed on vehicles, ships, and road facilities are ineffective in absorbing impact forces consistently across different collision directions and often result in significant damage due to their weight, which increases fuel inefficiency and fails to mitigate secondary accidents.

Innovation Solution

A shock absorption structure filled with air and reinforced with fiber threads and aramid fibers, equipped with adjustable air inlets and outlets, and a burst inducing part, which uses a tension line to wrap around the damaging object upon impact, allowing for directional independence in impact absorption and minimizing damage through controlled air discharge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional shock absorbers are installed to absorb impact force, then damage to vehicle and passengers is reduced, but the shock absorber cannot reduce damage caused by secondary or tertiary accidents after internal air is completely discharged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous protection capabilityVSAvoidinternal air discharge
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state parameters of the shock absorption medium from gas (air) to liquid (water). Liquid is incompressible and does not discharge like gas, allowing the shock absorber to maintain protective function continuously. The liquid-filled configuration enables the shock absorber to absorb repeated impacts without losing its cushioning capability, resolving the reliability issue of conventional air-filled shock absorbers that become ineffective after air discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional shock absorbers are used to absorb impact force, then shock protection is provided, but there is significant difference in impact force absorption depending on collision direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional impact absorptionVSAvoidcollision direction coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the shock absorber with a spherical geometry and internal liquid circulation system that provides universal shock absorption capability across all collision directions. The liquid medium can flow and redistribute pressure uniformly in any direction of impact, making the shock absorber equally effective whether struck from front, rear, side, or any angle, thus achieving multi-directional protection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The spherical shape of the shock absorber body allows uniform distribution of impact forces from any direction. The curved surface and internal liquid circulation path ensure that regardless of collision angle, the liquid can effectively absorb and dissipate energy, providing consistent protection performance across all orientations and eliminating the directional limitations of conventional shock absorbers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Reliability

If conventional shock absorbers are installed to protect against collisions, then impact force is absorbed, but the shock absorber has significant weight requiring many installation parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact protectionVSAvoidshock absorber weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a flexible membrane structure to contain the liquid shock absorption medium. This thin-film approach replaces heavy rigid metal housings with lightweight flexible material that can still contain the liquid under pressure and transmit the shock absorption effect. The flexible shell significantly reduces the weight of the shock absorber while maintaining its protective function, eliminating the need for heavy installation components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Reliability

If conventional shock absorbers are installed on vehicles, then collision protection is provided, but fuel efficiency is significantly reduced due to increased weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision protectionVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing heavy rigid structures with flexible thin-film membranes, the shock absorber weight is dramatically reduced. This weight reduction directly improves vehicle fuel efficiency while maintaining the collision protection function, as the flexible membrane is sufficient to contain the liquid medium and transmit the shock absorption effect without requiring heavy metal housings and mounting components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure effectively absorbs impact forces regardless of collision direction, reduces material and human damage, and maintains lightweight design to prevent fuel efficiency losses, while preparing for secondary accidents by controlled air discharge.

Implementation Method 1

a body which is filled with air inside and is able to absorb a shock occurring due to a collision of the body with a damaging object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

the internal air is completely discharged to the outside while the shock absorber absorbs the impact force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir discharge: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 3

a plurality of fiber threads for tautly connecting front and rear surfaces of the body to each other is provided inside the body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension: Tension

Implementation Method 4

the body may be provided with a strength reinforcement member made of aramid fibers at least on a front surface thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite materials: Composite Materials

Data Source

PatentUS20240301935A1Shock absorption structure and shock absorption system using same
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 DURIAN CO INC
  • US20240301935A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301935A1 patent drawing
  • US20240301935A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Proposed are a shock absorption structure and a shock absorption system using same, in which the shock absorption structure includes a body which is installed on a vehicle, a ship, and a road facility is filled with air inside, and can absorb shock occurring due to collision of a damaging object to absorb at least a predetermined level of impact force regardless of a direction in which the collision is applied and minimize damages due to accidents that may occur successively, wherein a plurality of fiber threads is provided inside the body, with air filled therein, such that when the damaging object applies at least a predetermined level of impact to one point of the body, fiber threads connected to portions adjacent to the one point break, and the body absorbs shock as the portions adjacent to the one point of the body wrap around the damaging object.