Mechanical Air-Fuel Restrictor Plate for Drag Racing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drag racing technologies lack a reliable, cost-effective, and easily adjustable method to restrict engine horsepower without electronic components, particularly in categories where electronic devices are not allowed, leading to inconsistent and time-consuming adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A restrictor device consisting of a main body member with a slideably insertable restrictor plate and a retaining/sealing cover, rigidly mounted between the air-fuel metering device and the intake manifold, allowing for quick and easy change of restriction by swapping distinct plates, providing consistent and accurate engine power reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a non-electronic throttle stop with manual adjustment is used, then the device is simple and cost-effective, but the adjustment precision and reliability are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidadjustment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The restrictor plate is segmented into multiple pre-drilled hole patterns, each providing a specific restriction level. This allows precise power adjustment without complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and adjustment precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple restriction configurations are merged into a single restrictor plate by drilling different hole patterns on the same plate. This eliminates the need for multiple separate plates or complex adjustment mechanisms, achieving both simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If a fixed restrictor plate is used, then the device structure is simple, but the adaptability to different power restriction needs is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidrestriction adjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The restrictor plate is divided into multiple functional zones with different hole patterns, allowing selection of different restriction levels based on racing conditions and engine requirements, enhancing adaptability while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A single restrictor plate performs multiple functions by incorporating different hole patterns that can be selected based on various racing conditions, engine configurations, and restriction needs, achieving versatility without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If electronic throttle stops are used, then the adjustment precision and reliability are improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower restriction reliabilityVSAvoidelectronic components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronic control system is extracted and replaced with a simple mechanical selection process. The restrictor plate with pre-drilled hole patterns provides reliable power restriction through pure mechanical means, eliminating electronic components while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses simple, inexpensive mechanical components (restrictor plate with holes) instead of expensive electronic systems. The plate can be easily replaced or adjusted by selecting different hole patterns, providing cost-effective reliable restriction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Device complexity

If manual adjustment of throttle stop is made, then the device is simple, but the time required for adjustment and the loss of information about previous settings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment mechanismVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The hole patterns are pre-configured on the restrictor plate during manufacturing, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual adjustments during setup. The desired restriction level is already prepared and can be quickly selected by installing the appropriate plate or covering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple restriction configurations are copied onto a single plate through pre-drilled hole patterns. This allows quick selection of different restriction levels without manual measurement or adjustment, reducing adjustment time and eliminating the need to remember previous settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS8453617B1Method and device for controlling air-fuel intake of an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2013.06.04 OLSON BRETT T
  • US8453617B1 patent drawing
  • US8453617B1 patent drawing
  • US8453617B1 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of a device and method for controlling or restricting the air-fuel mixture into an internal combustion engine having a body member rigidly mounted between the air-fuel metering device and the engine intake, a slidably insertable restrictor plate, and a retaining and sealing cover. The body member may contain a single spacer or two spacers and may contain either a slot or a groove that communicates with the plate. The plate may contain a plurality of bore holes and multiple distinct plates can be made in order to achieve various and linear amounts of restriction. The plate can be easily and quickly changed depending on the amount of restriction desired. One or more embodiments of the device can be used on engines in various motorized vehicles and in various motorsports, such as drag racing. Other embodiments are described and shown.