Air handler devices with improved design and functionality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern air handler devices rely on outdated structural designs, leading to inefficiencies in temperature control, increased operating and manufacturing costs, and noise issues due to reverse fluid flow and aerodynamic losses.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of an evase device with rounded corners to mitigate reverse flow, an intake device with a sloped inner funnel to reduce noise and aerodynamic losses, and an aero-acoustical fan intake device with a varying cross-sectional flow channel to accelerate fluid flow, along with an air handler device featuring multiple thermal transfer units for simultaneous heating and cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional sharp-cornered housing is used at the second side, then manufacturing is simpler, but reverse flow of fluid occurs at corners of the duct causing aerodynamic losses and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic lossesVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The housing at the second side is designed with rounded corners instead of sharp corners. This curvature modification eliminates flow separation and reverse flow at the corners, reducing aerodynamic losses and noise while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard rounding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Loss of energy

If conventional straight flow channels are used, then device complexity is reduced, but aerodynamic losses increase due to flow separation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic lossesVSAvoidflow channel geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow channel incorporates curved transitions and rounded corners throughout its length. These curved geometries guide fluid flow smoothly from the fan discharge to the duct interface, preventing flow separation and reducing aerodynamic losses without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional rectangular duct interfaces are used, then manufacturing is easier, but noise levels increase due to reverse flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelsVSAvoidduct interface geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The duct interface is designed with rounded corners that match the curved flow channel. This curvature continuity prevents flow separation and reverse flow at the interface, significantly reducing noise generation while remaining manufacturable through standard forming processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Use of energy by moving object

If conventional egress devices are used, then device complexity is lower, but fan horsepower consumption increases due to reverse flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefan horsepower consumptionVSAvoidhousing geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The housing incorporates rounded corners and curved transitions that eliminate flow separation and reverse flow. This geometric optimization improves fan efficiency by reducing the horsepower required to move the same volume of air, while the curvature can be achieved through standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These solutions reduce fan horsepower consumption, noise levels, and operating costs, while improving airflow efficiency and allowing for compact designs that meet height constraints, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective HVAC system.

Implementation Method 1

At the second side, the housing can have a rounded corner determined to mitigate a reverse flow of the fluid at corners of the duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReverse flow mitigation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

The inner funnel can comprise an outer surface that spans the upper portion and the lower portion. The outer surface can be sloped, causing the flow of the fluid entering the intake duct in the radial direction to change to the direction along the longitudinal axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow direction change: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

a cross-sectional area of the flow channel can vary between the inlet opening and the discharge opening in a manner that is determined to cause the flow of the fluid through the flow channel to continuously accelerate from a first location of the channel to the discharge opening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid acceleration: Venturi Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11674696B2Air handler devices with improved design and functionality
Publication Date: 2023.06.13 BEST TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11674696B2 patent drawing
  • US11674696B2 patent drawing
  • US11674696B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Architectures and techniques are presented that can facilitate improved design and function of certain air handler devices. Architectures directed to an improved air handler device can be designed to improve temperature control demands such as, e.g., concurrently heat and cool air and reducing device dimensions (e.g., size, weight) that can reduce costs and mitigate shipping and installation difficulties.