Air Handler U-Bend Design to Reduce Reverse Flow and Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern air handler devices suffer from inefficient structural designs that lead to significant energy loss, noise, and increased operational costs due to reverse flows and poor aerodynamic performance at duct transitions.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a U-bend design in air handler devices, featuring rounded corners and intermediate baffles, which reduces reverse flows and sound absorption, along with optimized fan placement and intake systems to enhance efficiency and reduce noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional sharp-cornered duct transitions are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but reverse flow occurs causing energy loss and reduced fan efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy lossVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature by replacing sharp corners with rounded corners at duct transitions. This geometric modification eliminates flow separation and reverse flow that occur at sharp edges, thereby reducing energy loss while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard forming processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the geometric parameters of duct transitions by introducing rounded corners with specific radii. This parameter change optimizes flow characteristics and reduces energy loss without significantly complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional intake devices are used, then structure is simpler, but noise levels are significantly higher

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidintake device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs curved surfaces in the intake device design, including rounded transitions and smooth contours. These curved geometries reduce turbulence and vortex formation, thereby lowering noise generation while adding moderate structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate flow conditioning elements such as flow straighteners or diffusers between the intake opening and fan. These intermediary components smooth the flow and reduce noise-generating turbulence, though they increase device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If optimized aerodynamic designs with rounded corners are implemented, then fan efficiency improves by 5-10%, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefan efficiencyVSAvoidhousing structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements rounded corners and smooth transitions in the housing structure to optimize aerodynamic flow. These curved features improve fan efficiency by reducing flow separation and turbulence, while the rounding can be achieved through standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes geometric parameters such as corner radii and transition angles to enhance aerodynamic performance. These parameter adjustments improve fan efficiency without requiring fundamentally new manufacturing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The U-bend design significantly improves fan efficiency by 5-10%, reduces noise levels, and lowers operational costs by minimizing energy consumption and heat rejection loads.

Implementation Method 1

the housing can have a rounded corner determined to mitigate a reverse flow of the fluid at corners of the duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

The outer surface can be sloped, causing the flow of the fluid entering the intake duct in the radial direction to change to the direction along the longitudinal axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow direction change:

Data Source

PatentUS12398891B2Air handler devices with U-bend design
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 BEST TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12398891B2 patent drawing
  • US12398891B2 patent drawing
  • US12398891B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Architectures and techniques are presented that can facilitate improved design and function of certain air handler devices. Architectures directed to an improved air handler device can be designed to improve temperature control demands such as, e.g., concurrently heat and cool air and reducing device dimensions (e.g., size, weight) that can reduce costs and mitigate shipping and installation difficulties. Architectures directed to U-bend structures can further reduce footprint on leasable space and provide improved acoustics, service access, and reduced energy consumption and infrastructure costs.