Air intake screen debris sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Working machines operating in environments with airborne particles and debris face inefficiencies in air intake screen cleaning, leading to potential overheating and reduced component lifespan due to debris accumulation, which existing cooling systems fail to address effectively.

Innovation Solution

An air intake screen debris monitoring and cleaning system that utilizes sensors to detect debris accumulation and activates a reverse airflow generation system to automatically clean the screen, ensuring efficient cooling and prolonging component life by only cleaning when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous reverse airflow is used to clean the air intake screen, then the screen remains clean and cooling efficiency is maintained, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic reverse airflow bursts instead of continuous airflow. The controller activates the reverse airflow generation system only when debris accumulation is detected by sensors, creating periodic cleaning cycles that maintain cooling efficiency while dramatically reducing energy consumption compared to continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor debris accumulation on the air intake screen and provide feedback to the controller. When the sensor detects significant debris buildup, it triggers the reverse airflow cleaning cycle. This feedback mechanism ensures cleaning occurs only when necessary, optimizing the balance between maintaining cooling efficiency and minimizing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If reverse airflow is generated frequently to prevent debris accumulation, then cooling efficiency is maintained, but component lifespan is reduced due to increased mechanical stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidcomponent lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic reverse airflow bursts based on actual debris accumulation levels rather than frequent scheduled operations. This reduces the cumulative mechanical stress on components while maintaining cooling efficiency by cleaning only when debris reaches thresholds that would impact performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors provide continuous monitoring of debris accumulation, enabling the controller to activate reverse airflow only when necessary. This feedback-based approach prevents unnecessary cleaning cycles that would subject components to unnecessary mechanical stress, thereby extending component lifespan while maintaining adequate cooling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Use of energy by moving object

If manual cleaning of the air intake screen is performed, then energy consumption is low, but productivity is reduced due to machine downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidmachine uptime
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service cleaning through the reverse airflow generation system that automatically removes debris from the air intake screen. The sensors monitor debris accumulation and trigger cleaning cycles without operator intervention, allowing the machine to maintain itself during operation and eliminating productivity losses from manual cleaning downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback system continuously monitors debris accumulation and automatically initiates reverse airflow cleaning when thresholds are reached. This eliminates the need for scheduled manual cleaning that causes machine downtime, as the system self-regulates and maintains optimal screen condition without removing the machine from service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of energy

If sensors are installed to detect debris accumulation, then cleaning can be optimized, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to detect debris accumulation levels and provides feedback to the controller, which activates reverse airflow only when necessary. This feedback mechanism optimizes energy usage by avoiding unnecessary cleaning cycles while the added sensor and controller components increase system complexity. The energy savings from targeted cleaning offset the complexity investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical cleaning with an automated reverse airflow system controlled by sensors and a controller. This substitution eliminates manual labor and optimizes energy usage through precise control, though it introduces additional components (sensors, controller, reverse airflow mechanism) that increase overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prolongs the life of cooled components and conserves energy by only generating reverse airflow when debris accumulation is significant, preventing overheating and maintaining efficient cooling operations.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor to sense debris that is collected on the intake screen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDebris sensing:

Implementation Method 2

a reverse airflow generation system to create a reverse airflow in a second direction opposite the first direction to clear debris from the intake screen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirflow generation:

Implementation Method 3

air is drawn in a first direction through a screen for cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11156192B2Air intake screen debris sensing
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 DEERE & CO
  • US11156192B2 patent drawing
  • US11156192B2 patent drawing
  • US11156192B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An air intake screen debris cleaning system may include an intake screen through which air is drawn in a first direction for cooling, a reverse airflow generation system to create a reverse airflow in a second direction opposite the first direction to clear debris from the intake screen, a sensor to sense debris that is collected on the intake screen and a controller to activate the reverse airflow generation system based upon signals from the sensor. In one implementation, the sensor comprises an emitter to emit a sensor beam that extends along a face of the air intake screen and which does not intersect or pass through the air intake screen prior to being sensed.